Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c s vaidyanathan · Page 1 of about 346 results (0.331 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2012

Zunaid Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2012

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : VAT Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

H.L. Dattu, Anil R. Dave, JJ.1. By this application, the applicants, who are appellants/petitioners in Civil Appeals @ SLP(C) Nos.13848-13868/2010 have prayed for incorporation of certain requests made in para nos.4 and 6 of the application....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1999

Ajit Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(1, 4 and 4A), 142 and 335; Punjab Secretariat Class III Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 7(1) and 9; Civil Secretariat Service, Class II Service Rules, 1963 - Rules 8(2) and 10; Punjab Civil Secretariat(Class I) Rules, 1974; Haryana Education Department(State Service, Group B) Rule, 1980 - Rules 9(3) and 11; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7)

Reported in : AIR1999SC3471; JT1999(7)SC153; 2000(1)MPHT1; 1999(II)OLR(SC)401; 1999(5)SCALE556; (1999)7SCC209; [1999]Supp2SCR521; (2000)1UPLBEC195

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor General,; Harish N. Salve,;

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. We have before us these three Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 to 3 filed for 'clarification' by the State of Punjab in Civil Appeal Nos. 3792-94 of 1989 (Ajit Singh Januja and Ors....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2011

Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Municipal Corpora ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (DMC Act) - Sections 349A, 99

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan; Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Maninder Singh; Mr. Manjul Bajpai; Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advs.

1. These writ petitions impugn Office Order dated 20 th November, 2003, Circular dated 7 th February, 2008 and the Office Order dated 8th April, 2010 of the respondent MCD levying fee and stipulating other conditions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2017

Rishabh Enterprises & Anr vs.ameet Lalchand Shah & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr. Amit Sibal, Dr. Saif Mahmood, Mr. Anish Dayal, Mr. Amit Bhandhari, Mr. Sumant De, Mr. Vivek Agarwal, Mr. Ishwar Mohanty

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h March, 2017. CS(COMM) No.195/2016. RISHABH ENTERPRISES & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan & Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2004

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Chief Secretary and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131 and 226; Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 18, 19, 46, 60, 60(4), 60(5), 60(6) and 60(7); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 321

Reported in : 2004(1)CTC641

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Counsel assisted by I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor, ;V. Raghupathi, Government Pleader, ;S. Jayakumar, Additional Public Prosecutor and ;C. Manishankar, Special Public Prosec

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, C.J.1. In Writ Petition No. 1238 of 2004, the constitutionality of Sub-Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Section 60 of Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2003 (Central Act 4 of 2004) is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2011

idea Cellular Ltd Vs. Uoi and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Jul-18-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate and Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Aneesh Patniak, Mr. Sandeep Singh, and Mr.Navin Cha

S.B. Sinha The petitioner is a licensee; the license having been granted by the respondent herein in terms of Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 on or about 27.02.2008 with effect from 25.01.2008. Indisputably,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2010

Kumarina Investment Ltd Vs. Digital Media Convergence Ltd. and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Aug-23-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: C.S. VAIDYANATHAN, SR. ADVOCATE, MANJUL BAJPAI, ASHISH YADAV ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: MANINDER SINGH, SR. ADVOCATE, MRS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, MS. NITYA THAKUR, ARJUN NATRAJAN,

S. B. Sinha Introduction: An interesting question involving ‘choice of law’ and ‘choice of forum’ choosing the English law of contract and London courts as the forum, under a contract entered into by and between the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1990

M. Ahamedkutty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 9 and 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Customs Act

Reported in : 1990(47)ELT188(SC); JT1990(1)SC143; (1990)2SCC1; [1990]1SCR209

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Setia;C.S. Vaidyanathan an; K.V. Viswanathan, Advs

K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted.2. After the Appellant landed at Trivandrum Airport from Abu Dhabi, he was intercepted by the customs officials detecting that he smuggled 13 gold sheets weighing 1280 gms. valued at Rs.4,26,240...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

Cellular Operators Association of India Versus Telecom Regulatory Auth ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONERS: C.S. VAIDYANATHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH NAVIN CHAWLA, SHARATH SAMPATH, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: VIKAS SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, WITH MR. SAKET SINGH, MANINDER SINGH, SR ADVOCAT

S.B. Sinha Legality and / or validity of a direction issued on 29.11.2005 by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) purported to be in terms of section 36 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1986

Frank Anthony Public School Employees' Association Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-17-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 23, 30, 30(1) and 337; Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1987SC311; 1987LabIC427; 1987MhLJ1(SC); 1986(2)SCALE805; (1986)4SCC707; [1987]1SCR238

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan,; M.K.S. Menon and; S.R. Bhatt, Advs

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. The scales of pay and other conditions of service of teachers and other employees of the Frank Anthony Public School New Delhi compare very unfavourably with those of their counterparts of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial