Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c s vaidaynath · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 08 2003

In Re: Hcl Infosystems Limited,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173, 184, 188(2), 293(1), 301, 370, 372, 372A and 391 to 394; Companies Court Rules - Rule 78

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas861(Delhi); 106(2003)DLT274; 2004(75)DRJ699; [2003]46SCL365(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.Vaidaynath, Sr. Adv.,; C. Mukhopadhyay,; Ajoy K. Roy

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. These are three petitions filed by the petitioner companies under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying for according sanction to the scheme of arrangement between M/s. HCL Infosystems Limited,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales