Advanced Search Results

Gauri Shanker Misra and ors. Vs. the Collector

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyArbitration

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Uttar Pradesh Defence of India (Compensation and Arbitration) Rules, 1943 - Rules 3, 4 and 75A; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 18 and 23

Reported in : AIR1964All488

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.P. Singh and ;V.B. Upadhya, Advs.

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. This First Appeal by 29 persons, who are fixed rate tenants, under Section 19 (1) (f) of the Defence of India Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed against...

J.K. Commercial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23A and 35

Reported in : [1969]73ITR464(All)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.P. Singh, Adv.

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. In these four connected writ petitions the same question of law arises and for that reason they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Writ Petitions Nos. 3251 of 1968 and 3252...

Lakshmipat Singhania Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 14(2)

Reported in : [1969]72ITR512(All)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.P. Singh, Adv.

T.P. Mukerjee, J.1. The question raised in this reference relates to the situs of accrual of income being remuneration paid to a director of a company limited by shares.2. The assessee was one of the six...

J.K. Cotton Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2) and 66(2)

Reported in : [1970]75ITR592(All)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.P. Singh, Adv.

V.G. Oak, C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act'). The assessee is a public limited company, Messrs. J.K. Cotton ., Kanpur. The...

Hukam Chand and anr. Vs. State Transport Authority Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 44 and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1961All571

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Pathak and ;C.S.P. Singh, Advs.

Mootham, C. J. 1. This is an appeal from an order of Mr. Justice James dated the 5th December, 1958, dismissing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. The relevant facts are these: On the...

Delta Engineering Co. Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1963]14STC515(All)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.P. Singh and ;H.C. Sharma, Advs.

M.C. Desai, C.J.1. The Judge (Revisions) has submitted to this Court a statement of case and has formulated the following question :-Whether centrifugal water pumps used for pumping water from tube well are exempt from tax...

Suresh Chandra Sharma Vs. Rajaswa Parishad, U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Revenue Executive Service (Naib Tahsildars) Rules, 1944 - Rules 24, 28(3) and 39(3); Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1930 - Rule 55(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1971All122

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Ghildyal, Adv.

Satish Chandra, J.1. This group of writ petitions has been filed by Naib Tahsildars. The petitioners are aggrieved at the order of termination of their services. In one case the petitioner has been reverted to the...

S.S. Chaudhary Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ391

C.S.P. Singh, J.1. The petitioner is standing trial before the Sessions Judge, Dehradun, being criminal trial No. 3/74 of 1975, for offences Under Section 120-B/204/467/ 477-A/466/409 IPC and Section 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act. During the...

Ram Saran Dauji Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1979]43STC292(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta, Adv.

C.S.P. Singh, J.1. After having heard counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the question referred should be reframed as under :Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the cheque drawn...

Smt. Urmil Bahri and ors. Vs. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110A(3)

Reported in : AIR1975All198

Advocate for Appellant : L.P. Naithani, Adv.

ORDERC.S.P. Singh, J. 1. Devendra Bahri, a practising lawyer of this Court met with a car accident, as a result of which he sustained injuries. He filed a claim for damages for the injuries so received....