Advanced Search Results
Mo. Kandaswami Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Chennai
Jul-23-1993
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17 and 226
AIR1994Mad2
Dr. C. Ramakrishnan, Counsel; Mr. M.O. Kandaswami Singh, Adv.
ORDER1. W.P. No. 12798 of 1993 is filed by MO. Kandaswami Singh, President of Ambcdkar Socialist Society. Maraimalai Nagar, Chengalpattu, seeking the relief of declaration that the naming of South Arcot New District as Villupuram Ramaswami...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Rm.M.Ct.M. Thiruppani Trust Rep. by Its Trustee, M.Ct. Pethachi Vs. ...
Chennai
Aug-20-1996
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 - Sections 20(1) and 22
1997(1)CTC695
C. Ramakrishnan, Adv. for ;Vishnu Mohan, Adv.
ORDERAli Mohamed, J.1. The prayer of the petitioner is to issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari or other appropriate writ calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in Rc.J2.No. 67077...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManaging Director, Brakes India Ltd. Vs. S. Packiaraj and the Assisant ...
Chennai
Jan-04-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
(2006)IILLJ437Mad; (2006)1MLJ233
C. Ramakrishnan, Adv. for ;S.Vishnu Mohan, Adv.
M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The Management of M/s. Brakes India Limited is the appellant herein. S. Packiaraj, the first respondent herein filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, the second respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Kannaiyan Vs. the Assistant Township Administration, T.A. Departmen ...
Chennai
Aug-19-1991
Service
(1992)1MLJ214
Mr. C. Ramakrishnan
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner challenges an order passed under Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (Act XL of 1971) on 22.6.1990, by which the petitioner was requested to surrender the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh M, vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-09-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21158 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:1. RAMESH M,SON OF MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. C.S. Subramanian and Others Vs. Kumarasamy and Others
Chennai
Feb-17-1994
Company
(1994)IMLJ438
S. Krishnaswamy, ;R. Gandhi, ;K. Ravichandra Babu, ;T.S. Sivagnanam, ;R.G. Narendran, ;N. Kannan, ;P. Rajagopal, ;R. Viduthalai, ;M. Veluswami, ;K. Parasaran, ;Habibullah Badsha, ;T.P. Sankaran, ;N.
Raju, J.1. The above writ petitions involve for determination certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. C.S. Subramanian Vs. Kumarasamy and Others
Chennai
Feb-17-1994
Consumer
[1996]86CompCas747(Mad)
Mr. K. Parsaran, ;Mr. Habibullah Badha, ;Mr. R. Gandhi, ;Smt. Nalini Chidambaram, and ;Mr. Chinnaswami, Senior Advs., ;Mr. M. Veluswamy, ;Mr. V. Prakash, ;Mr. Chandru, ;Mr. Kabir, ;Mr. Sriram Panchu
Raju, J.1. The above writ petitions involved for determination certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the Medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamakrishnan.T vs N.Premachandran
Kerala
Sep-22-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 31ST BHADRA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.1171 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 3864/2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.Surendran, vs F.T.Infrastructures Pvt.Ltd
Kerala
Oct-03-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 11TH ASWINA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 1712 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CS 183/2022 OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChakiat Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Chennai
Jan-05-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1)
[1994]210ITR383(Mad)
N.V. Balasubramanian, Adv.
Venkataswami, J. 1. All these writ petitions are directed against the order of the appropriate authority dated February 13, 1991 passed under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax, Act, 1961, in respect of the property bearing No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »