Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c ramakrishnan · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 23 1993

Mo. Kandaswami Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-23-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17 and 226

Reported in : AIR1994Mad2

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. C. Ramakrishnan, Counsel; Mr. M.O. Kandaswami Singh, Adv.

ORDER1. W.P. No. 12798 of 1993 is filed by MO. Kandaswami Singh, President of Ambcdkar Socialist Society. Maraimalai Nagar, Chengalpattu, seeking the relief of declaration that the naming of South Arcot New District as Villupuram Ramaswami...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1996

S.Rm.M.Ct.M. Thiruppani Trust Rep. by Its Trustee, M.Ct. Pethachi Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-1996

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 - Sections 20(1) and 22

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC695

Advocate for Appellant : C. Ramakrishnan, Adv. for ;Vishnu Mohan, Adv.

ORDERAli Mohamed, J.1. The prayer of the petitioner is to issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari or other appropriate writ calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in Rc.J2.No. 67077...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2006

Managing Director, Brakes India Ltd. Vs. S. Packiaraj and the Assisant ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ437Mad; (2006)1MLJ233

Advocate for Appellant : C. Ramakrishnan, Adv. for ;S.Vishnu Mohan, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The Management of M/s. Brakes India Limited is the appellant herein. S. Packiaraj, the first respondent herein filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, the second respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 19 1991

R. Kannaiyan Vs. the Assistant Township Administration, T.A. Departmen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-19-1991

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ214

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C. Ramakrishnan

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner challenges an order passed under Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (Act XL of 1971) on 22.6.1990, by which the petitioner was requested to surrender the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2025

Ramesh M, vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21158 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:1. RAMESH M,SON OF MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1994

Dr. C.S. Subramanian and Others Vs. Kumarasamy and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-1994

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1994)IMLJ438

Advocate for Appellant : S. Krishnaswamy, ;R. Gandhi, ;K. Ravichandra Babu, ;T.S. Sivagnanam, ;R.G. Narendran, ;N. Kannan, ;P. Rajagopal, ;R. Viduthalai, ;M. Veluswami, ;K. Parasaran, ;Habibullah Badsha, ;T.P. Sankaran, ;N.

Raju, J.1. The above writ petitions involve for determination certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1994

Dr. C.S. Subramanian Vs. Kumarasamy and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-1994

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas747(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Parsaran, ;Mr. Habibullah Badha, ;Mr. R. Gandhi, ;Smt. Nalini Chidambaram, and ;Mr. Chinnaswami, Senior Advs., ;Mr. M. Veluswamy, ;Mr. V. Prakash, ;Mr. Chandru, ;Mr. Kabir, ;Mr. Sriram Panchu

Raju, J.1. The above writ petitions involved for determination certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the Medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2020

Ramakrishnan.T vs N.Premachandran

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-22-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 31ST BHADRA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.1171 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 3864/2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2023

K.Surendran, vs F.T.Infrastructures Pvt.Ltd

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-03-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 11TH ASWINA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 1712 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CS 183/2022 OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1994

Chakiat Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1)

Reported in : [1994]210ITR383(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Balasubramanian, Adv.

Venkataswami, J. 1. All these writ petitions are directed against the order of the appropriate authority dated February 13, 1991 passed under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax, Act, 1961, in respect of the property bearing No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial