Advanced Search Results

Maruti Anandrao Dhekane Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 309 and 311(2); Bombay Police Act - Sections 2(6) and 7; Bombay Police Punishment and Appeals Rules, 1956 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR406; 2006(4)MhLj829

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Bandiwadekar, Adv.

S.B. Mhase, J.1. The petitioner has approached to this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari and thereby requesting this Court to quash and set aside the...

Pune District Supervision Co-operative Society Through Its Chief Execu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 14, 69A, 69A(4), 72 and 73

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Godbole and; Manjiri Parasnis, Advs. for Petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 124/2006, 5463/1996, 1

R.M. Savant, J.1. The above group of Petitions raise a common issue and involve identical facts and therefore, are heard and disposed of together. The challenge in the above Writ Petitions, save and except Writ Petition...

Shri. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid and Others Vs. the District Collector, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. These petitions arise from the proceedings undertaken for validation of Caste Certificates. The two points that we have framed for our consideration are common in all these petitions and thus, these petitions...

Kuldipkumar Girdhar Das and Co., a Registered Partnership Firm Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 65 and 70; Bombay Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR77; 2003(6)BomCR594; 2004(1)MhLj71

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., G.S. Kulkarni and ;Sonali Joshi, Advs. in Writ Petition Nos. 3433, 3434, 3436 and 3437 of 2003 and ;Nitin Thakker, ;G.S. Kulkarni and ;Sonali Joshi, Advs. in Writ Petition N

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. In all these petitions, common questions of fact and law have been involved. It is, therefore, appropriate if all the matters are decided by a common judgment.2. Rule, Mr.S.G. Aney, learned Special Counsel,...

Rajesh Sadanand Patil, Vs. the Additional Collector,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2003Bom304; 2003(2)ALLMR153; 2003(4)BomCR51; 2003(2)MhLj200

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Sabrad, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 7446, 7447 and 7448 of 2002 and 6 of 2003, ;P.N. Joshi, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 7486 and 7492 of 2002, ;V.S. Kapse, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 7503 and 7504

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule, Smt. J.S. Pawar, Additional GovernmentPleader, Mr. R.M. Patne, Mr. C.R. Sonawane, andMr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleaders,appear and waive service of notice of Rule onbehalf of Respondents. In the facts andcircumstances, all...

Ramesh Shivram Khairnar Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Sc ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 - Rule 12

Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR254; (2004)ILLJ970Bom; 2003(4)MhLj470

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Bandiwadekar, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. The matter was not on board but is taken on board at the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner in view of the fact that the interim relief granted earlier was to...

Suresh S. Bhamre, Police Inspector Vs. Devendra Purushottam Shinde, Po ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR540; 2003(6)BomCR611; 2003(4)MhLj856

Advocate for Appellant : A.A. Kumbhakoni and ;L.M. Acharya, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 3238 of 2003 and ;P.M. Pradhan and ;A.R. Pitale, Advs. Civil Application No. 1025 of 2003 in Writ Petition No. 3238 of 2003

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mr. P.M. Pradhan, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 in writ petition. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, appears and waives service...

Prabhakar Dattatraya Telgu Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21; Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR488; 2004(1)BomCR571

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J. 1. Rule. Mr.C.R. Sonawane, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. G.S.Hegde, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice...

Mrs. Suniti Ashok Sarathi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR484; 2004(1)BomCR574

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

C.K.Thakker, C.J. 1. Rule. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 Mr. K.K.Waghmare, learned counsel, appears and waives service...

Armed Forces Ex-Officers Multi-Service Co-op. Society Ltd. and Ors. Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 2(22) and 45B; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 65(2)

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ1369Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Kulkarni and ;Abhay Kulkarni, Advs.

B.B. Vagyani, J.1. The petitioners seek to challenge the legality and validity of recovery orders dated February 11, 1988 issued by respondent No. 2, under Section 45-B of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.2. In brief,...