Advanced Search Results
Prakash Shamsunder Dere and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-31-1984
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3
1985(2)BomCR234
C.R. Dalvi, Adv. for appellant No. 1 and ;C.A. Phadkar, Adv. for appellant No. 2
R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. We have already passed the final order in this appeal on 31st January, 1984 and we now proceed to give the reasons.2. In Sessions Case No. 84 of 1982 the two appellants before...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayant Madhav Chitale Vs. Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. and Others
Mumbai
Oct-11-1996
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 144 and 152 - Order 3, Rule 4(5) - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13 - Order 38, Rules 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Order XLV, Rule 15
AIR1997Bom126; (1996)98BOMLR715
C. R. Dalvi and ;G. M. Khambata, Advs.
ORDER1. Both these writ petitions arise out of order passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune on 12-8-1996. 2. Heard Mr. C. R. Dalvi, the learned counsel for petitioner in both the writ petitions. 3. Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCdr. John. A.R. Deans I.N. and Others Vs. Mr. Anil Kumar Mitra
Mumbai
Mar-08-1999
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13-A1 and A2 and 31-F
1999(3)BomCR364; (1999)2BOMLR283; 1999(2)MhLj330
C.R. Dalvi and ;S.M. Gorwadkar, Advs.
ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The petitioner has impugned in this revision application, the judgment and order dated 21-7-1992 passed by the competent authority, Konkan Division, Bombay in Case No. 12/89. The applicants are the owners of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State Vs. Sharadkumar Virchand Shah and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-19-1968
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 16, 16(3) and 16(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1969Bom348; (1968)70BOMLR710; ILR1969Bom1015; 1968MhLJ893
C.R. Dalvi, Asst. Govt. Pleader and ;S.B. Bhasme, Adv.
1. These two proceedings arise out of the decision of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Satana, on deputation at Malegaon in Cri, Case No. 5245 of 1965.2. The facts giving rise to these cases are few...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Sujan Suresh Sawant Vs. Dr. Kamlakant Shantaram Desa
Mumbai
Jul-22-2004
Contract
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 15; Contract Act - Sections 55 and 55(1)
AIR2004Bom446; 2005(1)ALLMR397; 2005(1)BomCR763
C.R. Dalvi and ;R.G. Ketkar, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal arises from a suit filed by appellant-Mrs. Sujan Suresh Sawant ('the plaintiff' for short) against the respondent - Dr. Kamlakant Shantaram Desai ('the defendant' for short), to seek dissolution and accounts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Leela Nagesh Mandke and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors ...
Mumbai
Jun-13-2006
Civil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(1), 9, 9A, 11, 15A, 17, 18 and 52; Tamil Nadu Recognised Private School (Regulation) Act, 1973 - Sections 53 and 53A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 41, Rule 11
2006(4)BomCR501
Sarvasri C.R. Dalvi and ;S.M. Gorwadkar, Advs., i/b., Rohit Pawaskar, Adv.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard. 2. This appeal arises from the Judgment and Order dated 26-10-2005 passed by the 9th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune on the preliminary issue relating to the jurisdiction of the Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Yeshwant G. Bodhe Vs. Shri D.S. Rajapurkar, Court Receiver, High C ...
Mumbai
Jul-13-2005
Tenancy
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 140; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 3, 5(7), 7, 7(5) and 12(3); Constitution of India - Article 227
(2005)107BOMLR161
C.R. Dalvi and ;S.M. Mhamane, Advs.
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioner-tenant has invoked Article 227 of the Constitution of India and sought to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 21st March, 1992, passed by the Additional District Judge, Pune, (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of the City of Nashik Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...
Mumbai
Jun-13-2002
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44, 47 and 154; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 126
2002(5)BomCR457
C.R. Dalvi, Adv.;P.N. Joshi, Adv. in C.A. No. 1328 of 2000
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition, the Municipal Corporation of Nashik has challenged the order passed by the Government of Maharashtra purportedly under section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodrej Rustom Karmani Vs. Hari Aildas Thadani and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-12-1990
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 23 and 23A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 43, Rule 1(4)
1990(3)BomCR587
K.J. Abhyankar, Adv. in A.O. 307/85 and ;C.R. Dalvi and ;A.G. Katki, Advs. in A.O. 228/85
H. Suresh, J.1. Both these appeals can be disposed of by this common judgment.2. The first appeal is by the original defendant and the second appeal is by the original plaintiffs, both being against an order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra, Throu ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Oct-20-2012
Land Acquisition
Shri. A.S.Jaiswal, Shri. Jaiswal
A.P. Bhangale, J. 1. Pursuant to Misc. Civil Application No.1129 of 2011 (Review Application) preferred by Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (hereinafter referred to as âBVBâ.) through its Attorney Shri T.G.L. Iyer, Civil Lines, Nagpur with a prayer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »