Advanced Search Results
Dwarka Prosad Agarwalla Vs. Director of Inspection
Kolkata
Jan-27-1981
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127(1), 132, 132(1), 132(5) and 132(12)
(1981)25CTR(Cal)58,[1982]137ITR456(Cal)
Nirmal Mukherjee, ;Pathak and ;Suchit Kumar Banerjee, Advs.
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges the searches at his place of business as well as at his residence and the seizure of certain jewellery,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Sale Trading Co. Vs. Gurdial Chand Khosla Decd. Thru. Lrs.
Delhi
Mar-26-2014
Education
Mr. S.C.Kalra
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.148/2012 % 26th March, 2014 MARUTI SALE TRADING CO. ......Appellant Through: Mr. S.C.Kalra and and Mr. V.K.Mehra, Advocates. VERSUS GURDIAL CHAND KHOSLA DECD. THRU....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahender Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-02-1991
Service
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10(4); Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 - Rule 5(1)
JT1991(3)SC462; (1992)ILLJ869SC; 1991(2)SCALE292; 1991Supp(2)SCC127; [1991]3SCR330; 1991(2)LC598(SC); (1991)2UPLBEC1084
C.P. Saxena and; Mukul Gupta, Advs
K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal is from an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi and concerns with the scope of Rule 10(4) of the Central Civil Service (CCA.) Rules, 1965 ('the Rules')2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Man Mohan Lal Vs. Suman Lal
Delhi
Feb-23-1996
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24
1996IAD(Delhi)925; 63(1996)DLT772
C.P. Saxena, Adv
M.K. Sharma, J. (1) The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 4.11.1995 passed by Shri A.K. Pathak, Additional District Judge,dismissing the application of the petitioner for variation of the maintenance allowance in H.M.A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.P. Srivastava Vs. Chancellor, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi and anr ...
Allahabad
Feb-15-1985
Service
Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 49, 51 and 68; Bundelkhand University Ordinances - Ordinances 2, 2(1) and 3
AIR1985All287
Pradeep Chandra, Adv.
ORDERB.N. Sapru, J.1. This writ petition is being decided after notice to the parties and with their consent at the admission stage.2. Sri R. P. Srivastava, the petitioner, is a Lecturer in Economics Department of Jawahar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShambhoo Sharan Pandey and anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Jan-15-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 302
2002CriLJ2209
O.P. Misra, ;G.S. Chaturvedi and ;G.D. Misra, Advs.
J.C. Gupta, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 2079 of 1986 is by Shambhoo Sharan Pandey and his son Kaushal Kumar Pandey against their conviction and sentence for imprisonment of life under Section 120B/302 I.P.C. The connected Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Mohinder Singh Vs. the Financial Commissioner (Taxation), Chandiga ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jun-02-1989
Tenancy
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 9 and 9A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Rules, 1956 - Rule 15
AIR1990P& H336
C.P. Saxena, Adv.
ORDER1. In this petition under Articles. 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the short question involved is, as to whether a small landlowner is entitled in law to get possession of his land back from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Dass Indurakhya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Apr-27-1972
Criminal
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 99-A, 99-A(1), 99-B, 99-C, 99-D and 99-F
AIR1972SC2086; 1972CriLJ1323; (1972)3SCC676; [1973]1SCR392; 1972(4)LC938(SC)
Ram Punjwani and; P.C. Bhartari, Advs
G.K. Mitter, J.1. This appeal by special leave from a judgment and order of the High Court of MadhyaPradesh dismissing the writ petition of the appellant challenging the order of the State Government under Section 5...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›