Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c p saxena · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.105 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 27 1981

Dwarka Prosad Agarwalla Vs. Director of Inspection

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-27-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127(1), 132, 132(1), 132(5) and 132(12)

Reported in : (1981)25CTR(Cal)58,[1982]137ITR456(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Nirmal Mukherjee, ;Pathak and ;Suchit Kumar Banerjee, Advs.

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges the searches at his place of business as well as at his residence and the seizure of certain jewellery,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2014

Maruti Sale Trading Co. Vs. Gurdial Chand Khosla Decd. Thru. Lrs.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.C.Kalra

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.148/2012 % 26th March, 2014 MARUTI SALE TRADING CO. ......Appellant Through: Mr. S.C.Kalra and and Mr. V.K.Mehra, Advocates. VERSUS GURDIAL CHAND KHOSLA DECD. THRU....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1991

Mahender Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-1991

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10(4); Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 - Rule 5(1)

Reported in : JT1991(3)SC462; (1992)ILLJ869SC; 1991(2)SCALE292; 1991Supp(2)SCC127; [1991]3SCR330; 1991(2)LC598(SC); (1991)2UPLBEC1084

Advocate for Appellant : C.P. Saxena and; Mukul Gupta, Advs

K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal is from an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi and concerns with the scope of Rule 10(4) of the Central Civil Service (CCA.) Rules, 1965 ('the Rules')2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 1996

Man Mohan Lal Vs. Suman Lal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)925; 63(1996)DLT772

Advocate for Appellant : C.P. Saxena, Adv

M.K. Sharma, J. (1) The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 4.11.1995 passed by Shri A.K. Pathak, Additional District Judge,dismissing the application of the petitioner for variation of the maintenance allowance in H.M.A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1985

R.P. Srivastava Vs. Chancellor, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi and anr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-15-1985

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 49, 51 and 68; Bundelkhand University Ordinances - Ordinances 2, 2(1) and 3

Reported in : AIR1985All287

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Chandra, Adv.

ORDERB.N. Sapru, J.1. This writ petition is being decided after notice to the parties and with their consent at the admission stage.2. Sri R. P. Srivastava, the petitioner, is a Lecturer in Economics Department of Jawahar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2002

Shambhoo Sharan Pandey and anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 302

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2209

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Misra, ;G.S. Chaturvedi and ;G.D. Misra, Advs.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 2079 of 1986 is by Shambhoo Sharan Pandey and his son Kaushal Kumar Pandey against their conviction and sentence for imprisonment of life under Section 120B/302 I.P.C. The connected Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 1989

Sh. Mohinder Singh Vs. the Financial Commissioner (Taxation), Chandiga ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-02-1989

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 9 and 9A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Rules, 1956 - Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1990P& H336

Advocate for Appellant : C.P. Saxena, Adv.

ORDER1. In this petition under Articles. 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the short question involved is, as to whether a small landlowner is entitled in law to get possession of his land back from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1972

Narayan Dass Indurakhya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-1972

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 99-A, 99-A(1), 99-B, 99-C, 99-D and 99-F

Reported in : AIR1972SC2086; 1972CriLJ1323; (1972)3SCC676; [1973]1SCR392; 1972(4)LC938(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Punjwani and; P.C. Bhartari, Advs

G.K. Mitter, J.1. This appeal by special leave from a judgment and order of the High Court of MadhyaPradesh dismissing the writ petition of the appellant challenging the order of the State Government under Section 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial