Advanced Search Results
Lalsen Tripathi Vs. Ivth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kan ...
Allahabad
May-11-1998
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Undertakings (Special Provisions for Prevention of Unemployment) Act, 1966 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4(1) and (2)
1999(1)AWC146
C.P. Ghildyal, Adv.
D. K. Seth, J.1. Mr. C. P. Ghildyal, learned counsel for the petitioner has raised very intricate but interesting question of law while supporting the petitioner's contention arising out of the present writ petition.2. By an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalram Tiwari and Others Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Varanasi an ...
Allahabad
Feb-11-2000
Limitation
2000(2)AWC1471
K. K. Singh, ;C. P. Ghildyal and ;R. A. Sharma, Advs.
D. S. Sinha and Ratnakar Dash, JJ.1. Instant petition was filed through Sri C. P. Ghildyal, the learned counsel of the petitioners, more than eleven years ago, to be precise, on 29.9.1988, and was admitted on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Vidya Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-10-2002
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997 - Sections 6(1A) and 12; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1998 - Rule 22; Constitution of India; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66
AIR2003All1; MANU/UP/0914/2002
C.P. Ghildyal, ;H.P. Dubey, ;A.R. Dubey, ;A.D. Saunder and ;B.B. Singh, Advs.
S.K. Sen, C.J.1. In the writ petition No. 1025 of 2001 (Tax) and in all the connected writ petitions, common questions of facts and law are involved and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ved Pal Singh and Others Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P., ...
Allahabad
Mar-04-1998
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2 (31), 70, 72, 80, 87, 87(1), 89 (2), 98, 100 (3), 103 (2) and 104; Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(3)AWC1644
C.P. Ghildyal, Adv.
D.K. Seth, J.1. In the present case, it is alleged that the petitioners were granted permits in the route Saharanpur-Shamli pursuant to the resolution dated 36.8.1997. The petitioners who are holding those permits (13 in number)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Trivedi Engineering and Industries Ltd. Through U.C. Shukla, Perso ...
Allahabad
Feb-15-2007
Labour and Industrial
[2007(113)FLR1044]
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri C.P. Ghildyal, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri K.P. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Smt. Sumati Rani Gupta, Advocate and Sri Shyam Narain, Advocate on behalf of workmen.2. Petitioner is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Singh Vs. Director, Institute of Medical Sciences, B.H.U. and a ...
Allahabad
Jan-25-2002
Constitution
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 16; Constitution of India - Articles 16(4) and 226; Banaras Hindu University, 1915 - Sections 5(7)
2002(2)AWC1196; (2002)3UPLBEC2203
R.G. Padia, ;Prakash Padia, ;C.P. Ghildyal, ;S.K. Singh, ;V.K. Singh, ;B.K. Srivastava, ;B.K. Mishra and ;B.P. Singh, Advs.
Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged an order passed by the respondent-university dated 26.11.1992 (Annexure-11 to the petition) whereby the petitioner's admission to M.B.B.S. course in the Institute of Medical...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Lal Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-31-1991
Labour and Industrial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 154(2)
[1991(62)FLR896]; (1992)IILLJ531All; (1991)1UPLBEC480
L.P. Naithani and ;C.P. Ghildyal, Advs.
R.K.K. Trivedi, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated March 15, 1990 (Annexure 16) by which he has been removed from service. The petitioner was serving as Inspector in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Farmers Fertilizers Co-op. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Allahabad
Sep-16-1992
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35B and 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q and 196
1993(64)ELT169(All)
Murlidhar and ;C.P. Ghildyal, Advs.
D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Murlidhar, the learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner, and Sri Shishir Kumar, the learned counsel representing the respondents.2. By means of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra Rao Vs. Regional Trasport Authority, Gorakhpur Region, Gorakh ...
Allahabad
Feb-10-1992
Motor Vehicles
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 71 (2), 72 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47 (3) and 64A
AIR1992All211
Sri. C.P. Ghildyal, ;L.P. Naithani, ;A.D. Saunders and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.
ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. Petitioners who are the existing operators holding stage carriage permits, have by means of these writ petitions challenged the orders, passed by the Regional Transport Authorities (hereinafter referred to as the RTA) granting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Dular Tripathi Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Sep-03-1997
Service
Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 49A and 49A(1); Discipline and Appeal Rules - Rules 3 and 4
1998(1)AWC282
C.P. Ghildyal, Adv.
R. A. Sharma, J. 1. Normally this Court does not interfere with the order of suspension of Government servant but for the reasons given hereinafter, the instant case warrants Interference with such an order suspending the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »