Advanced Search Results
Tan Bug Taim Vs. Collector of Bombay
Mumbai
Aug-09-1945
Civil
AIR1946Bom216; (1945)47BOMLR1010
Bhagwati, J.1. The petitioners are partners carrying on business in partnership in the firm name and style of Kokwah Chinese Restaurant at Dhanraj Mahal, Apollo Bunder, Bombay. They have been occupying shops Nos. 1, 5 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Jayantilal L. Gandhi
Mumbai
Mar-16-1978
CustomsLimitation
Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61-A(2), 64, 64-A, 67, 67-A and 85; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30 - Schedule - Article 113; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120
AIR1979Bom12; (1978)80BOMLR393; 1979MhLJ411
C.N. Daji and ;B.S. Bhesania, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla and Craige, Blunt & Caroe
Kantawala, C.J.1. The facts of this appeal should only be shortly stated, as we propose to dispose of the same only on one point, viz, the bar of limitation.2. It is the case of the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Jankibai Prahladrai Brijlal Seksaria Vs. Kashinath Raghunath Kelk ...
Mumbai
Jan-21-1971
PropertyTrusts and Societies
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19 to 22, 22A, 31(1), 50, 79, 79(1) and 80; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 3 - Order 2, Rules 3 and 4
AIR1972Bom199; (1971)73BOMLR729; 1972MhLJ92
C.N. Daji, Adv., ;B.N. Shroffi, Adv., i/b, ;Ambubhai and ;Diwanji Attorneys, Advs.
ORDERGatne, J.1. This civil revision application has been directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court at Bombay on 16-2-1970 in Suit No. 1362 of 1960 on his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S. Framji Vs. Union of India Represented by General Manager, Western R ...
Mumbai
Apr-25-1958
Labour and IndustrialConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 309, 310, 311 and 313; Indian Railway Establishment Code - Rule 143
(1958)60BOMLR1302; (1959)ILLJ107Bom
C.N. Daji, ;Vakil Dadabhow and ;Bharucha, Advs.
Chagla, C.J. (1) Arather interesting, and by no means easy, Constitutional question arises in this appeal. The plaintiff, whose suit was dismissed by the learned City Civil Court Judge on a preliminary issue, was a guard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd.
Mumbai
Jul-17-1970
Commercial
Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 16A, 18, 28, 29, 30, 61A, 61A(1), 61-B, 62, 63, 64, 64-A, 66, 67, 73, 87, 87(1), 87(2) and 148; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20
AIR1971Bom317; (1971)73BOMLR1
C.N. Daji and ;Y.B. Rege, Advs.
Kotval, C.J.1. This is a defendants' appeal against a decree for Rs. 35,000/- and interest awarded as damages sustained by the plaintiffs in respect of their goods. The Premier Automobiles Ltd., the plaintiffs, are engaged in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Gani and Co. Vs. Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Mumbai
Sep-26-1951
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70, 73, 74 and 75
AIR1952Bom310; (1952)54BOMLR273; ILR1952Bom747
B.M. Mistry, ;C.N. Daji and ;K.S. Cooper, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.(1) This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiffs for return of a deposit made by them of a sum of Rs. 3,000 under a contract which they entered into with the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamanlal Maganlal Vs. Binani Commercial Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-22-1955
Contract
Supply and Prices of Goods Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 7, 10 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 249; Sale of Goods Act
AIR1958Bom15; (1957)59BOMLR1131; ILR1955Bom1089
Manecksha, A.H. Mehta and ;C.N. Daji, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Mr, Justice Coyajee and the appeal came to be filed in the following circumstances: The plaintiffs filed a suit in respect of a contract arrived at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›