Advanced Search Results

Charuvil Koshy Varghese Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 30 and 33

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR692; 1998(2)BomCR387; 1998(2)MhLj177

Advocate for Appellant : C. Mascarenhas, Adv.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The appellant was entrusted the work of Rural Water Supply Scheme to Village Deussua and surrounding areas in Salcete Taluka by the respondent. Certain disputes arose and the appellant filed his claim before...

Smt. Serolina D'Costa and Others Vs. Antonio Jose Rodrigues and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Constitution

Oral Judgment: Heard Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri C. Mascarenhas, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Shri V. Menezes, learned Counsel appearing for...

Mahesh Mehta Huf and Mahesh G. Mehta Karta of Mahesh G. Mehta Huf Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 357(3) and 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406 and 420

Reported in : I(2007)BC358; (2006)108BOMLR381; 2006CriLJ1142

Advocate for Appellant : Amira Razak, Adv.

N.A. Britto, J.1. This revision is filed by the accused in C.C. No.101/N/2000/C against his conviction and sentence imposed upon him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(Act, for short), by Judgment/Order dated 1862003...

Jaisingrao Abasaheb and Others Vs. Pratapsing Wamanrao Rane and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

This appeal is filed by respondents no. 1 to 5 of Land Acquisition Case No. 77 of 1989 against the Judgment and Award dated 14/08/2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mapusa in the said...

T.V.P. Bhaskar Rao Vs. M/S. Susheela Homes and Properties Private Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Heard Shri S. Kamat Malyekar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri C. Mascarenhas, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard forthwith. 3....

Efigenio Dias and Another Vs. Joaquim Manuel Aries Gomes and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. This First Appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Trial Judge in Civil Suit no. 267/2004 on 27.12.2007, by which Civil Suit filed by the Appellants (original Plaintiffs)...

Hermano De Souza (Deceased) Through His Heirs and Others Vs. Agostinho ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. C. Mascarenhas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. S. Redkar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Rule. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned counsel. 3. The learned...

K.K. Suresh Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 33

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR663; 1998(3)BomCR717

Advocate for Appellant : C. Mascarenhas, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This revision application challenges the order dated 20th June 1997 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem in Special Civil Suit No. 84/94/A. By the impugned order the trial Court has appointed...

Antonio Salvador Francisco Joaquim Celemente Mesquita and Another Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 31 and 32(1)

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR612; 2000(2)BomCR185

Advocate for Appellant : C. Mascarenhas, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 2. This revision arises against the Order dated 2nd September, 1998 passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 239/93 by the Civil Judge J.D., Margao. By the...

P.P.C. Constructions Vs. National Buildings Construction Corporation L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5 and 20

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR397

Advocate for Appellant : C. Mascarenhas, Adv.

T.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. Rule. By consent to be heard forthwith.2. The petitioners are a partnership firm who have undertaken some work with the respondent. It appears that disputes have arisen during the execution of the...