Advanced Search Results
Sanjay @ Gangadhar Vishvarup Shelke and Another Vs. State of Maharasht ...
Mumbai
Mar-24-1999
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 396
2000(5)BomCR684
C.M. Kothari, Adv.
ORDERSmt. Ranjana Desai, J.1. The appellants-original Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were tried in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 22 of 1997 for offences punishable under sections 396 and 342...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Shankar Mhasane and Another
Mumbai
Feb-27-1992
Criminal
1994(1)BomCR84; 1993CriLJ1134; I(1992)DMC424
C.M. Kothari, A.P.P
Saldanha, J. 1. To what extent would instances of ill-treatment of a wife, repeated over a period of time and of a nature sufficiently serious, justify a conviction under S. 498A of the Indian Penal Code,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAddl. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Laxmi Nigam.
Allahabad
Nov-09-1977
Direct Taxation
(1978)7CTR(All)1
D. M. Chandrashekhar, C.J. - At the instance of the Revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) had referred u/s. 256 of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Om Dutt Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-30-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1)
(2005)194CTR(P& H)239; [2005]277ITR63(P& H)
Akshay Bhan, Adv.; Rajesh Bindal, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. In compliance of order dt. 25th Aug., 1986, passed by this Court in ITC Nos. 35 and 50 of 1986, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short, 'the Tribunal') has referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kanchanlal Vadilal
Mumbai
Mar-09-1993
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(3)
(1994)116CTR(Bom)140; [1993]203ITR218(Bom)
G.S. Jetley, Adv.;Subhash Shetty, Adv.
Dr. B.P. Saraf J. 1. By this reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the direction of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Rai Sood Vs. Income Tax Officer.
Delhi
Sep-30-1992
Direct Taxation
(1993)45TTJ(Del)246
ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These appeals involving identical grounds are disposed of by means of a consolidated order having been heard together.2. The appellant in this case is a director in two family concerns, namely, M/s....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K. Govindarajulu (Decd.) by Legal Repre ...
Chennai
Feb-22-1988
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 27, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 64(1), 65 and 256(1)
[1988]173ITR112(Mad)
C.V. Rajan, Adv.
Srinivasan, J.1. The assessee, who died during the pendency of these tax cases, was the managing director of M/s. Sri Hari Mills Private Limited. He gifted certain agricultural lands to his wife, who has been brought...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Dutt Vs. Cit
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-30-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN824(Punj& Har)
Akshay Bhan, for the Assessee Rajesh Bindal, for the Revenue
G.S. Singhvi, J.In compliance of order dated 25-8-1986, passed by this court in ITC Nos. 35 and 50 of 1986, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') has referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Venkatachala thevar Vs. State of Madras and anr.
Chennai
Jul-19-1971
Direct Taxation
Madras Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2)
[1972]86ITR701(Mad)
V.S. Ramakrishnan, Adv.
Ramaprasada, J.1. The writ petitioner is the father propositus. In 1954, he settled properties which belonged to him in favour of his minor son and daughters, who were born by that time, and also in favour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSagar @ Dharamsingh @ Motilal @ Daku JaIn @ Rajput @ Kanjarbhat and or ...
Mumbai
Aug-12-2002
Criminal
(2003)105BOMLR291
V.K. Tahilramani, J.1. The instant Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 21.8.1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri in Sessions Case No. 3 of 1997 whereby the Additional Sessions Judge convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »