Advanced Search Results
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Veena Mehta and ors.
Delhi
Nov-12-1976
Contract
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 229
ILR1977Delhi364; 1977RLR126
S. Balakrishnan and; K.R. Gupta, Advs
C. Misra, J.(1) This revision petition has been- filed by the defendant, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order of Mr. S. R. Goel, Additional District Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMatter of the Contempt of Court Vs. D.B. Vohra and ors.
Delhi
Nov-12-1973
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 10 and 15
ILR1974Delhi466
D.B. Vohra,; B.B. Kishore,; B.D. Gupta,;
S.N. Andley, C.J. (1) Certain incidents happened in the Court of Mr. Ravi Kumar, Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Delhi, on August 17, 1973 involving his reader (Chander Mohan), D. B, Vohra, Bishan Dayal Gupta, Advocates and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMargaret George Chandamamnil Vs. Chandamannil Mananman George
Delhi
Aug-14-1975
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 22
AIR1976Delhi190; 12(1976)DLT116; 1976RLR504
C.L. Joseph and; A.K. Gupta, Advs
B.C. Misra, J.(1) This first appeal has been filed by the wife against the order of the Additional District Judge, dated 5th January, 1973, by which he dismissed the petition of the wife for grant of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.P. Sharma Vs. Shasffi Bala
Delhi
Oct-16-1978
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13
ILR1979Delhi288
Madan Bhatia and; C.L. Joseph, Advs
V.D. Misra, J. (1) This Letters Patent Appeal by the husband is directed against the judgment of a single Judge of this Court upholding the order of the trial court dismissing the petition of the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Kumar Vs. Kamaljit Kaur
Delhi
Dec-14-1984
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24
1985(9)DRJ68
L.R. Gupta,; Rajiv Gupta and; C.L. Joseph, Advs
Yogeshwar Dayal, J. (1) This is a petition(2) On or about 31/08/1978, a petition for divorce was filed by the husband-petitioner against the wife-respondent in the court of DistrictJudge, Delhi.(3) Case of the petitioner was that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManojkumar M vs the Joint Regional Transport Officer
Kerala
Oct-26-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 23486 OF 2015 PETITIONER: MANOJKUMAR M AGED 42 YEARS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFathima Beevi, vs Joly John,
Kerala
Mar-07-2022
“C.R.”IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.10.2021...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph vs Joseph George
Kerala
Jan-11-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 21ST POUSHA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 2854 OF 2023 OS 137/2022 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ETTUMANOOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCaletal Developers Private Ltd.Represented by Managing Director Sri. A ...
Kerala
Nov-24-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, OP (RC) NO. 213...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Joseph and ors.
Kerala
Jun-01-1971
CompanyDirect Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18(3D), 18(6) and 51; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(22), 2(35), 194, 276 and 276B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 205(3); Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Income Tax Rules - Rule 30(1); Finance Act 1969
[1972]83ITR362(Ker)
V. Parameswara Menon, Adv.
Sadasivan, J.1. The Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, Kottayam, is the appellant in all these appeals. Complaints were brought against the respondents-office bearers of the Ettumanoor Motors (P.) Ltd., under Sections 276(d) and 276B of the Income-tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »