Advanced Search Results
Laxman Bapu Berad Vs. Sudhakar Nanasaheb Jawale
Mumbai
Aug-05-1997
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 - Order XLI, Rule 23; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(3);
1998(1)ALLMR667; 1998(2)BomCR259
C.K. Shinde, Adv.
ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. This writ petition raises a question of law relating to the scope of jurisdiction of the first Appellate Court after the matter is remanded to it by the superior Court. 2. Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisan Yeshwant Dhirade Vs. Sonabai Bappu Lohar Since Deceased Through ...
Mumbai
Jun-23-1994
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - 1948 - Sections 29(2), 29(3), 31 and 37(1)
1995(2)BomCR172
C.K. Shinde, Adv.
M.S. Vaidya, J.1. Heard Mr. C.K. Shinde, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. V.D. Hon, for respondent Nos. 1(a) and 1(b). Mr. D.R. Jaibhar, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 absent.2. This writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayashree Narendra Katariya and ors. Vs. Somnath Damodhar Kale,
Mumbai
Nov-19-2009
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 116 and 166; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95 and 95(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304A, 337, 338 and 427
2010(112)BomLR20
A.H. Kasliwal, Adv. in First Appeal No. 41 of 1996, ;S.V. Kulkarni, Adv. in First Appeal No. 472 of 1995 and ;C.K. Shinde, Adv. in First Appeal No. 218 of 1997
N.D. Deshpande, J.1. These are three Civil Appeals directed against one and the same judgment and award dated 14-9-1995 passed by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar in Motor Accident Claims Application No. 63 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kantabai Shivaji Gadakh Vs. Jagannath Bhika Gadakh and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-12-2005
Civil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35A, 96, 100, 107, 107(1) and 151 - Order 8, Rule 6A to 6G - Order 18, Rules 1 to 19 - Order 41, Rules 22, 31 and 33 - Order 43, Rule 1
2006(5)BomCR843; 2006(3)MhLj152
C.K. Shinde, Adv.
ORDERS.B. Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal from order under Order 43, Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' for the sake of brevity) is directed against the judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay S/O Namdeo Mutha Vs. the Director, Maharashtra Educational Rese ...
Mumbai
Aug-02-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India, Articles 14, 15, 16 and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
1996(1)BomCR656
Sunil A. Kulkarni, ;S.V. Chandole, ;N.R. Salunke, ;R.R. Suryawanshi, ;S.D. Dhongade, ;Kiran Dantal, ;N.K. Kakade, ;C.K. Shinde, ;S.L. Beedkar, ;S.B. Kulkarni, ;V.M. Kendre, ;V.G. Sakolkar, ;N.B. Patil
B.N. Deshmukh, J.1. Rule in all the petitions, returnable forthwith. The learned A.G.P. waives service on behalf of the concerned respondents.2. These petitions raise important point of law and affect large number of Assistant Teachers teaching...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPashamiya S/O Khajamiya Attar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-13-2008
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(3)ALLMR770; 2008(6)BomCR248; 2008(3)MhLj149
S.B. Gastgar, Adv.
P.V. Hardas, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission.2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJankibai Balwant Rajhans Since Deceased by Her Legal Heirs Vs. Suryabh ...
Mumbai
Jul-26-1996
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 15, 27 and 37
1997(3)BomCR543
C.F. Deshmukh, Adv. for ;R.N. Dhorde, Adv. for petitioners 1-b to 1-d
R.G. Deshpande, J.1. The land Survey No. 600 situated at village Sonai (Taluka : Newasa, District : Ahmednagar), having area of 5 Hectares .05 Ares is the subject matter of the present petition. The said land...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhakar Sabaji Kandalkar Vs. Tahsildar, Sangamner and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-20-2000
Limitation
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 35(3B); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
2002(1)ALLMR606; 2002(1)MhLj881
S.R. Barlinge, Adv.
1. Heard Shri S.R. Barlinge, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Shri C.K. Shinde, learned A.G.P. for respondent State and Shri N.C. Garud, learned Advocate for the respondent.2. In this writ petition, very interesting question is raised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Vishnu Salve and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-17-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 375 and 376
2006CriLJ587
M.S. Shrivastava, Adv. for ;S.R. Ghanekar, Adv.
A.S. Bagga, J.1. Both these criminal appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 31/10/1994, passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Aurangabad in Session Case No. 14/1994, whereby the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Patilba Gunjal Vs. Vithal Tulshiram Gunjal
Mumbai
Jun-26-1996
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(18), 4 and 70
1997(2)BomCR230
C.V. Korhalkar, Adv.
R.G. Deshpande, J.1. The petitioner, who alleges himself to be a tenant on the field Survey No. 403, situated at village Daithana Gunjal with an area of 1 Hectare and 59 Acres, has approached this Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »