Advanced Search Results

V.K. Thampi Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 35G(1) and 35G(3); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 52A, 52A(5), 173Q, 226 and 233A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 1991LC272(Kerala); 1989(24)LC445(Kerala); 1990(48)ELT13(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker,; K.K. Dinesan and; C.C. Thomas, Adv

K.A. Nayar, J.1. The petition is for a direction to the second respondent to state the case and to refer to this Court the questions of law raised by the petitioner in paragraph 17 of the...

K.S. Balachandran Vs The Kerala State Housing Board

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 17181 OF 2023 PETITIONER: K.S. BALACHANDRAN AGED 67 YEARS S/O.C.K.S....

A. Abdul Gafoor Kunju Vs. Avva Ummal Pathumma Beevi and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1224

ORDERChettur Sankaran Nair, J.1. An order of the Court of Session, Trivandrum enhancing maintenance awarded to a divorced Muslim wife and her daughter, after the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (hereinafter called...

V.K. Thampi Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Central Excise Rules - Rule 52A(5); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(76)ELT255(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker, Adv.

Paripoornan, J. 1. Petitioner is the proprietor of M/s. Vitco Rubber Industries. He is engaged in the manufacture of Tread Rubber. This commodity is excisable. There was a surprise visit of the petitioner's factory by the...

R.S. Ramdas and ors. Vs. Krishnan Nair and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964 - Sections 106, 106(1A), 106(2), 125(1) and 125(3)

Reported in : AIR1984Ker142

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker,; P.G.P. Panicker,; P.S. Balakrishnan

Bhaskakan Nambiar, J.1. Defen-dants 3 to 5, the legal representatives of the first defendant are the appellants.2. When the plaintiff was a minor, his grandmother and mother acting as guardian entrusted the plaint property, about 54...

Swami Premananda Bharathi Vs. Swami Yogananda Bharathi and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 99 and 105(1) - Order 26, Rules 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : AIR1985Ker83

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker, Adv.

Paripoornan, J.1. These are connected appeals. The 1st defendant in O. S. No. 2 of 1962. District Court. Quilon, is the appellant in A. S. No. 32 of 1978. The 1st plaintiff in O. S. No....

Balakrishnan Nambiyar and ors. Vs. Kanakathidathil Madhavan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 - Sections 51 - Schedule - Article 3(A)(1); Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1962 - Sections 33 and 60

Reported in : AIR1979Ker40

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker,; P.V. Madhavan Nambiyar and; T. Karunak

Chandrasekhara Menon, J. 1. These cases have come up before the Full Bench on a reference by a Division Bench of this court (Balakrishna Eradi and Balaganga-dharan Nair, JJ.) wherein the correctness of the decision of...

Annamma Vs. Ouseph Tressiamma

Court : Kerala

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70 and 72; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 91 and 93

Reported in : AIR1975Ker185

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker,; P.G.P. Panicker and; T.A. Narayanan Na

Subramonian Poti, J.1. An interesting question has been raised in this Second Appeal and the case has been referred to a Full Bench in view of the importance of the question. Can a decree-holder-auction-purchaser institute a...

R. Vasudevan Pillai Vs. K. Malathy Amma

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1988Ker300

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker and; K.S. Radhakrishnan, Advs.

Sukumaran, J. 1. A widow is obstructed in diverse ways, in her attempts at getting what is her legitimate due. All that she wanted was a settlement of accounts and recovery of the money that it...

Sankara Warrier and ors. Vs. Sreedevi Warrasyar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1973Ker250

Advocate for Appellant : C.K.S. Panicker, Adv.

K. Sadasivan, J.1. Defendants 2 and 4 to 6 are the appellants. The plaintiffs sued for partition of their 7/9 share in the A schedule properties and B schedule movables and for recovery of shares with...