Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c harikrishnan · Page 1 of about 54 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Sep 10 2001

N. Soundarajan and ors. Vs. Union Bank of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-2001

Subject : Banking

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 135

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas199(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Sr. Adv. and ;S.K. Kannan, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated February 6, 1986, in O. S. No, 586 of 1982 on the file of the Third Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. Defendants Nos. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 11 1997

V. Shankar Ram Vs. Mrs. Sukanya

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12 and 28; Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 120; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR1997Mad394; (1997)IIMLJ170

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Senior Council

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan. J. 1. This appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22-10-1991 in O.P. No. 88 of 1990 on the file of the Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 28 2003

B. Ramachandra Adityan Vs. M. Amarnath,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1921; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 3; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2003]114CompCas550(Mad); (2003)3CompLJ224(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Sr. Counsel for ;H. Karthik Seshadri

ORDERP. Sathasivam, Adv. 1. By consent of the parties, the main revision petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal. 2. CRP.No.464 of 2003 is directed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Periyakulam dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Feb 18 2003

Mrs. Vasantha Ramanan Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441(2) and 446(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5 and 34

Reported in : [2003]114CompCas747(Mad); [2003]47SCL710(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Adv. for ;C.S.K. Satish, Adv.

D. Murugesan, J.1. The applicant in all the three company applications is one Mrs. Vasantha Ramanan. The respondents in all the three applications are common. In Company Application No. 1418 of 2001, the applicant has prayed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 20 2006

Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Chairman and Chief Executiv ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-20-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Registration Act; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10 and 19; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Land Acquisition Act; Guardians and Wards Act; Succession Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 4, 100A, 104, 104(1) and 104(2) - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC97; (2006)2MLJ171

Advocate for Appellant : A.L. Somayaji, Sr. Counsel in L.P.A. 21/05 for ; R. Shankaranarayanan, Adv., ;C. Harikrishnan, Sr. Counsel in L.P.As. 22 and 23/05 for ; H. Karthick Seshadri, Adv., ;N.R. Chandran, Sr. Counsel in L.P

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since all the appeals arise out of the very same order of the learned single Judge, they are being disposed of by the following common judgment. 2. Questioning the order dated 28.09.2005 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 08 2002

B. Ramachandra Adityan Vs. Educational Trustee Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 25, 33, 433 and 434(1); Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92

Reported in : [2003]113CompCas334(Mad); [2003]41SCL385(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan and ;S. Subbulakshmi, Advs.

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The first respondent is a company incorporated on 8-8-1958 as a private limited company, limited by shares. The authorised capital of the first respondent company is Rs. 20,000, divided into 2,000 shares of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Dec 24 1998

M/S. Gordon Woodroffe and Company Limited, Uk, Rutland House, 44, Maso ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-24-1998

Subject : company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 -- Sections 10, 111 (1) (4) (7), 187, 247, 250 (3), 283, 293, 299, 372, 397, 398 (1), 399, 402, 403; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 11; Sick Industrial Companies Special Provisions Act, 1985 -- Sections 15, 17, 18 and 372; Securities Contract Regulation Act, 1956 -- Sections 22A; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973; Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 10E (4), 115;

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas582(Mad); 1998(3)CTC589

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anil B. Divan,;Senior Counsel for M/s. Ramasubramaniam Associates and;Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy,;Senior Counsel, Mr. A.L. Somayaji,;Senior Counsel Mr. C. Harikrishnan,;Senior Counsel Mr. Vedantham Sri

ORDER1. All these eight appeals arise out of the orders passed by the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi in two company petitions, namely, C.P.No. 45 of 1993 and C.P.No. 16 of 1994, dated 12.5.1998.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 04 1991

K.C.P. Ltd. Vs. Inspector of Police, Tiruvottiyur and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 22(2) and 26(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ365Mad; (1991)IIMLJ329

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Adv.

1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows : '... To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 31 2006

L. Rama Subbu and K.S.A. Krishnamoorthy Vs. Madura College Board, Madu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-31-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1882; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25, 397, 397(2), 398 and 399; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 and 402

Reported in : [2008]143CompCas505(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Harikrishnan, Sr. Adv. for K.J. Rebello, Adv.

V. Dhanapalan, J. 1. Two of the members of the Respondent Company called Madura College, having been aggrieved by the order dated 10.02.1998 of the Company Law Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'CLB'), made in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 07 1992

Sree Aravindh Steel (P.) Ltd. Vs. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-07-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 193, 297, 300, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(3), 433, 434(1) and 439(B)

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas607(Mad); (1998)1CompLJ451(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C. Harikrishnan

Lakshmanan, J.1. Company Petition No. 69 of 1991 was filed by Sree Aravindh Steel Private Limited under section 433(e) and (f) read with sections 434(1)(a) and 439(b) of the Companies Act (1 of 1956), directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales