Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c chinnaswami · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 10 1999

Ponnuswamy Vs. L. Guruswamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 276C and 277; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 12, 15, 17, 19, 26, 29(1), 29(2), 29(4), 190(1), 193 and 325

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2353

Advocate for Appellant : C. Chinnaswamy, Standing Counsel ;for S. Haja Mohideen Gisthi, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The common question that arises in all these revisions is this :Whether the Chief Judicial Magistrate has got the jurisdiction to try the Economic Offences triable by the First Class Magistrate, when once...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1990

S. Rangaraj Vs. R.R. Subbayan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 18, 19 and 21A; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 15, 16, 18 and 19; Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : II(1990)DMC277

Advocate for Appellant : C. Chinnaswami, Adv.

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This first Appeal is by the first defendant in O.S. No. 267 of 1975 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. The respondents herein areas follows : The first-respondent is the first-plaintiff;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1983

Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd., Employees' Union vs. Asst. Commissioner of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-08-1983

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 10A, 12, 12(3), 12(4), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 22, 23, 25(F) and 25(G)

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ181Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. G. R. Prasad

1. The appellant is the writ petitioner.2. The writ petitioner is the Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd. Employees' Union represented by its Secretary. The writ petition was filed praying for the issue of a writ of declaration,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 1992

C. Narayanaswamy Nadar and ors. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Repre ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-1992

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ136

Venkataswami, J.1. Admit by consent, the writ appeals are taken up for final disposal. These writ appeals are directed against a common order of the learned Judge dismissing the writ petitions which challenged acquisition proceedings.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 1982

K.M. Mutusamy Vs. the Commissioner, Panchayat Union and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-10-1982

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1983)2MLJ271

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.V. Sankaran

S. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 796 of 1977 is the appellant in this writ appeal. He was working as a Junior Assistant in. Thockanaickanpalayam Panchayat Union Council on his transfer from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1983

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Commr. and Secy., Revenue Dept. a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-1983

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ273

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Ramanathan

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common order of Padmanabhan, J., in W.P. Nos. 1903 and 1904 of 1980. The appellants herein are the respondents in the Writ Petitions. For the sake...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1991

Chellammal Vs. Alandur Municipality, Represented by Its Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-1991

Subject : Municipal Tax

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ299; (1992)1LW110

Thangamani, J.1. The plaintiff who has lost in both the courts below has preferred this Second Appeal. She is the owner of the premises bearing door No. 33, Kothawal Street, Alandur. The property tax for this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2006

T. Goraknathan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Decided on : Nov-30-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)IISLJ360CAT

1. The applicant was functioning as Commissioner of Income Tax (DR) in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) during the period 2001 to 2003 having jurisdiction to hear appeals filed by certain high profile individuals such...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2000

M/S. Thiru Muruga Finance Rep. by Its Partner Sri V. Thirunavukkarasu, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 - Sections 15; Constitution of India -- Articles 14, 19 (1)(G), 21, 246 and 254(2) -- Schedule VII; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Reserve Bank of India Act (amended), 1997; Tamil Nadu Act, 1997 -- Sections 45; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 -- Sections 5; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Companies Act, 1958 -- Sections 58A; State Bank of India (Subsidary Banks) Act, 1959; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 -- Sections 3; Industrial Development Bank of India Act, 1964 -- Sections 6A; Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 2; Hire-Purchase Act, 1972 -- Sections 2; Indain Partnership Act, 1932; Code of Cri

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC609

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C. Chinnasamy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. P. Rajamanickam, ;Mr. Jeyakumar and ;Mr. S. Ramasamy, Advs., ;Mr. M. Palanichamy Party-in-person

ORDER1. All these writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act XIV of 1997). Hence, they are dealt with in a common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1983

S. Bagianathan and ors. Vs. the Secretary to the Govt. of Tamil Nadu, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-17-1983

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ359

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, O.C.J.1. In these writ appeals, the two substantial questions that arise for consideration are (1) Whether a department of a municipality dealing in the distribution of electricity will come under the Industrial Employment (Standing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial