Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c b patne · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 2003

Ankur Vidya Mandir Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3) and 7A

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ658MP

Advocate for Appellant : C.B. Patne, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated November 28, 2002, passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, whereby it is held that petitioner is liable to comply with the provisions of the Provident...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1991

LupIn Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57F, 57G and 57(I); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC305; 1992(59)ELT375(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M Mathur, Sr. Adv. and C.B. Patne, Adv.

ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. Shri A.M. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Shri C.B. Patne, for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Neema, Central Govt. Advocate, for the respondents, were heard on admission and on application for ad interim relief.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2001

Mridula Chincholikar and ors. Vs. Indore Development Authority and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-07-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT348

Advocate for Appellant : C.B. Patne, Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioners are venting out their grievances of not getting promotion, by way of presentation of this writ petition challenging the order Annexure R-l by which respondent 3 Smt. Amita Makwana has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 2003

Jhabar Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-10-2003

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : II(2004)DMC356

Advocate for Appellant : C.B. Patne, Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated 13th June, 1997, passed by learned Sessions Judge, West Nimar, Mandleshwar in Sessions Trial No. 178/1996, whereby convicted the appellant for commission of murder...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1993

B.K. Rubber Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-1993

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 1993(44)ECC229; 1993(68)ELT575(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;C.B. Patne, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard Shri A.M. Mathur with Shri C.B. Patne for the petitioner on admission.2. This is a petition filed by a manufacturer, whose products are exigible to excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1991

Gajrajsingh Prahladsingh Thakur and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 17 and 62; Foreign Liquor Rules - Rule 1, 2, 2(2) and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 47 and 226

Reported in : AIR1992MP93; 1993(0)MPLJ557

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pandya. Adv.

V.S. Kokje, J.1. This case was heard along with Misc. Petition No. 280/91 (Viresh Chandra Patidar v. The State of M. P. The relief sought in both the cases as well as the grounds on which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1991

Raghavendrasingh Bhadoria Vs. State Bank of Indore and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-1991

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 10 and 85A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas112(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;C.B. Patne, Advs.

V.S. Kokje, J. 1. This is a petition by purchaser of a demand draft claiming a restraint order on the drawer and drawee Branches of State Bank of Indore injunctingthem from honouring the demand draft even...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1991

Beta Naphthol Limited Vs. Cegat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-04-1991

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC258; 1996(83)ELT36(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;C.B. Patne, Advs.

ORDERV.S. Kokje, J.1. In this petition, the petitioners have challenged an order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Special Bench) (for short 'the CEGAT') imposing condition of deposit of Rs. 7 lakh 89...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial