Advanced Search Results

Vedanta Limited & Ors vs.directorate General of Foreign Trade &amp ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Anish Kapur, Mr. Dhritiman Roy

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 07.2018 Pronounced on:28.11.2018 LPA482017, CM APPL. 2395/2017, CM APPL. 27489/2017 VEDANTA LIMITED & ORS ..... Appellants % + Through: Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv....

Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 17 18, 21, 23, 27, 28, 28(3), 29, 29(2), 30(1), 33, 48, 49, 78 and 79; Companies Act, 1956; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 17(2); Copyright Act - Sections 63; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 417, 419, 420 and 486; ;Indian Partnership Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC3304; 2006(6)ALD36(SC); 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)402; (2007)1GLR594; JT2006(8)SC393; 2006(33)PTC281(SC); 2006(8)SCALE631; (2006)8SCC726

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai, ; C.A. Sundaram and; Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv

ORDER ON THE APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION 9. By a judgment and order dated 17.03.2000, the learned Trial Judge opined that the plaintiff company was the owner of the trademark. It was further held that the defendants...

Khushwant Singh and anr. Vs. Maneka Gandhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32, 51A, 104, 105 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Evidence Act - Sections 74

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi58

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Shridhar, Chitale, Adv

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. 'He that publishes a book runs a very great hazard, since nothing can be more impossible than to compose one that may secure that approbation of every reader' - rightly observed...

Joy Auto Works and ors. Vs. Sumer Builders (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 89 and 90; Indian Easement Act, 1882 - Sections 13, 19 and 41

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR170; JT2009(5)SC332; 2009(5)SCALE222; (2009)4SCC691:2009AIRSCW3462:2009(5)LHSC3006

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Kavin Gulati,; Ruby Singh Ahuja

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. One Khatau Bhanji (hereinafter referred to as `Bhanji') was said to be the owner of Original Plot No. 227 measuring 4874.95 sq. yards within the city of Mumbai. The Arbitrator appointed...

Church of North India Vs. Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(10), 2(13), 3, 3A, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 18, 18(5), 18(7), 19, 20, 21, 21(2), 22, 22(3), 22A, 22(1A), 26, 31, 36, 37, 37(2), 41A(1), 41(2), 47, 50, 51, 51(4), 52A, 71, 74, 79, 79(2) and 80; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 13; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1939; Limitation Act; Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act - Sections 84(2) and 93; Industrial Disputes Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 84 and 86; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 and 93 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 254

Reported in : (2005)10SCC760; 2005(2)LC945(SC); MANU/SC/2531/2005

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Rohini,; Sashank Kumar and;

S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION1. The extent of bar of jurisdiction of Civil Court under Section 80 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BPT Act') is the question involved in this appeal...

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.A. Sundaram,;Senior Counsel for M/s. V. Nataraj, Adv.

ORDER1. This judgment shall govern writ petition Nos.9469 and 9470 of 1998 as the parties are common and also the controversy involved. Common petitioner herein is a company registered under the Companies Act which carries its...

Dr. Narottam Mishra vs.election Commission of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Mr. Zafar Inayat, Mr. Bharat Singh, Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Ms. Rohini Musa, Mr. Apoorv Tripathi, Mr. Akshat Bajpai

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. 03.2018 Pronounced on:18. 05.2018 LPA4802017 DR. NAROTTAM MISHRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Mr. Zafar...

industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Cannanore Spinnin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 20, 21, 29, 56, 128 and 130 to 141; Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Development and Regulations Act; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 20; Nationalisation (Sick Textile Undertakings Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(2); Constitution of India - Article 136; Sick Industrial Companies (Industrial Provisions) Act, 1995 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR2002SC1841; 2002(3)ALD113(SC); 2002(2)ARBLR676(SC); II(2002)BC430(SC); [2002]110CompCas685(SC); (2002)4CompLJ337(SC); JT2002(4)SC318; (2002)3MLJ144(SC); 2002(3)SCALE574;

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Anuradha Dutt,; Ekta Kapil and;

Banerjee, J.1. The general rule of equity expounded by Sir Samuel Romilly as counsel and accepted by the Court of Chancery in Crythorne v. Swinburne (1807) 14 Ves. 160, that the surety will be entitled to...

Gopaldas Udhavdas Ahuja and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5(2), 8(1), 8(6), 15A(5), 16(1), 16(5), 55(3), 58, 59, 64, 66, 71(1), 74, 85(1), 98B, 98B(1), 98B(2), 105 and 178(1); Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 119, 132, 132(5) and 132A; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 126A to 126Z; Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Ordinance, 1975; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 3; Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1963; Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1966; Gold (Control) Ordinance, 1968; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 110(1), 138A and 151; Opium Act - Sections 9 and 10; Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2004SC3830; (2004)190CTR(SC)1; 2004(176)ELT3(SC); [2004]268ITR273(SC); JT2004(5)SC300; 2004(6)SCALE141; (2004)7SCC33

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Shridhar Y. Chitale,; S.V. Pikale

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 5.1.1994 passed in Appeal No. 19 of 1992, by which the...

Sumitomo Corporation Vs. Cdc Financial Services (Mauritius) Ltd. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10(1), 10F, 397, 398, 399 and 402; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 8, 37, 44, 45, 47, 47(2), 48 and 50; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 to 20

Reported in : AIR2008SC1594; 2008(1)ARBLR452(SC); (2008)1CompLJ393(SC); JT2008(3)SC32; 2008(4)MhLj31; 2008(3)SCALE92; (2008)4SCC91; [2008]82SCL495(SC); 2008AIRSCW1766; MANU/SC/1101/2008

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Krishnan Venugopal,; Rahul P. Dave

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in F.A.O. No. 305 of 2006 by which the High Court dismissed...