Advanced Search Results

ipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Savita Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR696; 2002(4)MhLj407

Advocate for Appellant : Birendra Saraf and ;Manish Saurashtree, Advs., i/b., Shantilal & Co.

ORDERS.J. Vaziftdar, J.1. The Plaintiff filed this suit to restrain theDefendant from infringing its copyright in respect ofits cartons, passing off its goods as the goods ofthe Plaintiff and for damages. The Plaintiff hasalso sought to...

Janhit Manch and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Prin ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. This Petition, purportedly filed for public interest, seeks to question the legality of a 56 storied residential building known as ‘Palais Royale' and a...

Creative Tours and Travels (India) Private Limited Vs. Intellectual Pr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Saraf

Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. By this Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner challenges the order passed on 26th November 2012 by Respondent No.1. 2. By the impugned order, the...

Essar Oils Limited Vs. Central Warehousing Corporation and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. By this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Petitioner seeks to challenge award of the sole Arbitrator directing the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.52,35,842/- to the Respondents....

Gaurang Dinesh Damani Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order: 1. In this PIL filed in January 2011, the petitioner had prayed for various reliefs including direction to the Union of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to make clearer rules to ensure...

Deepak Natwarlal Parekh Vs. Tejas Natwarlal Parekh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sonak, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7 May 2014 made by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the appellant's (original defendant's) notice of motion no. 1532...

ICICI Bank Limited and Another Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greate ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The challenge in this petition is to the notices (Exhibits A-1 to A-7) and the order dated 24 October 2007 (Exhibit I) requiring the petitioners to obtain permission and pay fees for the purposes of...

In Re: Pharmaceutical Products of India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanySICA

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77, 81(1A), 100 to 104, 235, 251, 390, 391, 391(2), 433 and 529A; Drugs Act; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16 to 19, 19(4), 22, 22(1), 25, 32, 32(1), 77(4), 77A and 77A(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 128; Drugs Rules

Reported in : [2006]131CompCas747(Bom); (2006)5CompLJ282(Bom); [2006]70SCL93(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virag Tulzapurkar, Adv., i/b., Rajesh Shah and Co.;Sham Mehta, ;Darshan R. Mehta, ;Rishab Shah and ;Salil K. Shah, Advs., i/b., Dhruv Liladas and Co.;Shrikant Chavan, Adv., i/b., by Vandana Jaisingh,

A.M. Khanwailkar, J.1. This common judgment disposes of both the abovementioned company petitions. By these petitions filed under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioner-company prays that the arrangement embodied in the scheme of...

Pune Ganesh Festival Janotsav, Pune Ganesh Utsav Samitee, a Public Cha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act 1949 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR604; 2004(3)BomCR452

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioners praying for an issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Pune Municipal Corporation, respondent No. 1 herein, not to make any expenditure on cultural activities,...

Uran Education Society a Registered Public Charitable Trust and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (Annop V. Mohta, J.) 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties in view of the urgency expressed and the issues raised. 2. The petitioners, an unaided private school,...