Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: binod poddar and · Page 1 of about 82 results (0.031 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 23 2004

In Re: Tata Yodogawa Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Compani ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-23-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 78 and 100

Reported in : [2005(2)JCR93(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar and; Biren Poddar, Advs.

ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Upon the above petition of Tata Yodogawa Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company), above named, presented to this Court on 22nd August, 2004 (sic--2003?) for adjustment of miscellaneous expenditure (to the extent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Mahabit Prasad Bajaj

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-27-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 34, 120B, 132, 139, 139(4), 139(5), 142(1), 142(2), 143, 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 152(3), 153(1), 156, 183, 193,196 256(1), 271(1), 276C, 277 and 278B; Finance Act, 1985; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Jharkhand)233; [2008]298ITR109(Jharkhand); [2008(4)JCR709(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Jhunjhunwala, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar-II, Ranchi filed two applications under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1984-85, 1985-86 and prayed to the Appellate Tribunal to refer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2003

Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-24-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(2)

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR368]; [2003(2)JCR505(Jhr)]; (2003)IILLJ659Jhar

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Sr. Adv.,; Nisha Thakur and; Darshana Podd

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing notices and the entire proceeding being Minimum Wages Case No. 1/2002 and also for quashing the claim petition filed by the Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 2009

The Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-27-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2421

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Sr. Adv.,; Anubha Rawat Choudhary,; Piyush

ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. for the following reliefs : (a) For quashing the order dated 19.4.2000 relating to the financial year 1972-73...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2008

Smt. Namita Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and Vijay Bhaskar

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-12-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 277

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2716; (2008)218CTR(Jharkhand)666; [2009]308ITR109(Jharkhand); [2008(4)JCR364(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Sr. Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 07.08.2004 taking cognizance of the offence under Section 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1998

Saurabh Kumar Pandey and Nitish Kumar Pandey Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-08-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Biren Poddar and B.K. Jalan, Advs.

Sachchidanand Jha, J. 1. As the dispute involved in these two writ petitions is one and the same and the facts are also almost the same, they have been heard together and are disposed of by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2005

Jindal Roadways and Company Vs. the India Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-11-2005

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Law

Reported in : III(2005)BC461; [2005(1)JCR368(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar,; Biren Poddar,; D.K. Sinha and;

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Petitioner seeks direction upon the respondents to open the Price bid in respect of the Tender Notice invited by them on 5.7.2004 for removal and transportation of loose dump and top soil to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2004

Binay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-01-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR147(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Sr. Adv.

ORDER1. Heard the parties.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.1.2004 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. (S) No, 985 of 2002 dismissed the said writ petition.3. The petitioner filed the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1998

Amit Coke Industries Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-19-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 7(3)

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar and A.K. Sahani, Advs.

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated November 3, 1997 rejecting its application for grant of exemption from payment of tax under the Industrial Policy, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 'the policy') issued, vide notification Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Chotanagpur Wood Products Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR442(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar,; Biren Poddar,; S.K. Mishra and;

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 3.1.2004 passed by Conservator of Forest being the appellate authority in Appeal No. 3/2003 whereby he has confirmed the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial