Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: bimal roy jad a c · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1999

HussaIn Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-1999

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 20, 21 and 27; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules - Rule 66

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)785; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)167; 2000(72)ECC14; 2000(3)KLT805(SC); 2000(6)SCALE684; (2000)8SCC139; [1999]Supp4SCR189

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad, (A.C.), Adv

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. This seems to be a very unfortunate case in which the appellant by his fatality had languished in jail already for a long period of 5 years, when as a matter of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2004

Malleshi Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 362, 363, 364A and 365

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)833; 2004CriLJ4645; JT2004(8)SC72; 2004(7)SCALE671; (2004)8SCC95

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad (A.C), Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), and sentenced to life imprisonment by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Chitradurga (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial