Advanced Search Results

Jyoti Kumar Malviya Vs. Indian Farmers Fer. Co-Op. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3062 OF2006NON-REPORTABLE JYOTI KUMAR MALVIYA Appellant(s) VERSUS INDIAN FARMERS FER. CO-OP. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) KURIAN, J.JUDGMENT1 Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the...

HussaIn Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 20, 21 and 27; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules - Rule 66

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)785; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)167; 2000(72)ECC14; 2000(3)KLT805(SC); 2000(6)SCALE684; (2000)8SCC139; [1999]Supp4SCR189

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad, (A.C.), Adv

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. This seems to be a very unfortunate case in which the appellant by his fatality had languished in jail already for a long period of 5 years, when as a matter of law...

Dr Abdul Hameed Fazli and anr. Vs. Adam Malik Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 29 and 29(2)

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)661; (1997)IILLJ752SC; 1996(8)SCALE101; (1996)11SCC423; [1996]Supp7SCR317; 1997(1)LC148(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad, Adv.

ORDER1. This Special Leave Petition has been filed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Allahabad made on September 4, 1996 in MCWP No. 38618/94.2. The admitted position is that for one permanent...

State of Punjab Vs. Harbans Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Arms Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2003SC2268; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)96; 2003CriLJ2335; JT2003(4)SC9; 2003(3)SCALE788; (2003)11SCC203

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad and; Sunita Pandit, Advs

Santosh Hegde, J.1. State of Punjab has preferred these appeals against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 13th July, 1994 made in Criminal Appeal No. 206-DB of 1992 whereby...

Bhupinder Kumar Vs. Angrej Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 28 and 28(1); Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 12

Reported in : 2010(2)MhLJ1(SC); (2009)8MLJ417(SC); 2009(12)SCALE4; (2009)8SCC766; 2009(9)LC4113(SC); [2009] 13 SCR 978

Advocate for Appellant : Bimal Roy Jad, Adv

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 23.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Revision No. 2972 of 2003 whereby...

m.c. Mehta Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Applicant-In-Person

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13029 OF1985M.C. Mehta …Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondent(s) ORDER Deepak Gupta, J.Modern conveniences bring with them their own problems....

Iel Suprevisor Association Etc. Etc. Vs. Duncan Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Appellant : Satya Mitra

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 9382-9384 OF2017IEL SUPERVISORS' ASSOCIATION ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS DUNCAN INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.The appellants are before this Court,...

S.i. Rooplal and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor Through Chief Secretary, Delhi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police(Appointment and Recruiment) Rules, 1980 - Rules 5 and 17; States Reorganisation Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR2000SC594; [2000(85)FLR305]; JT1999(9)SC597; 1999(7)SCALE466; (2000)1SCC644; [1999]Supp5SCR310; 2000(2)SLJ395(SC); 2000(1)LC252(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Solicitor General,; P.P. Rao,; S.K. Dh

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Civil Appeal Nos. 5363-64/97 are preferred against the order dated 28.10.1994 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. nos. 14145/94. W.P. (C) No. 191/99 filed before this...

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : AAKARSH KAMRA __ DEBASIS MISRA

Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722...

Swatantra Bharat Mills and Dcm Silk Mills Ltd. Vs.delhi Development Au ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Ms. Meghna Mishra, Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Mr. Varun Kumar, Mr. Saurabh Seth, Ms. Avshreya Rudy, Ms. Nandini Singh

$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h February, 2018 Decided on :6. h March, 2018 + CM (M) 1173/2010 SWATANTRA BHARAT MILLS AND DCM SILK MILLS LTD. ........ Petitioner...