Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: bhaskar sen · Page 1 of about 112 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 01 2011

Mr. Mohammed Rafique at Rafik Shaikh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Mar-01-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhaskar Sen; Mr. Tirthankar Ghosh Mr. U.S. Menon; Mr. Arabinda Sen, Advs

1. The moot question involved in this litigation is whether the Court is entitled to allow the parties to settle a dispute resulted in a criminal proceeding in respect of a cognizable offence and, if so,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1974

Jatindra Kumar Dass Vs. Dhirajlal Vrajlal Kanakia

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-30-1974

Subject : ContractTenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 1, Rules 6 and 10 - Order 6, Rule 17; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 and 25; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 43

Reported in : AIR1975Cal123

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen, Advs.

Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. The undisputed facts in this case are that the plaintiff is the owner of the premises No. 9, Pollock Street, Calcutta, consisting inter alia, of an one-storied godown and that one P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2002

Krishna Vir Singh Vs. Sabyasachi Sengupta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-19-2002

Subject : Contempt of CourtCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 11, 12, 16, 18 and 34; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 3

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT56(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen and ;Santimoy Panda, Advs.

K.J. Sengupta, J.1. All the three matters have the common origin, as to question of payment and non-payment of the claims and dues of the writ petitioner in terms of the Order dated 9th May, 1996,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2002

Mehta Suraya and I.P.M. Industries Limited and ors. Vs. United Investm ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 122, 129, 151, 152, 153 and 153A - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 20, Rule 3 - Order 41, Rules 10 and 11; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108, 111 and 115; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act - Sections 13(2), 13(5) and 16; ;Original Side Rule - Rule 7

Reported in : AIR2002Cal108,(2002)2CALLT272(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Anindya Mitra, ;P.K. Roy and ;S.K. Kapoor, Advs.;B.K. Bachawat and ;Pratap Chatterjee, Advs.;Bhaskar Sen, Adv.

1. The decree in C.S. No. 183 of 1999 was put to execution In G.A. No, 3750 of 2000 by the decree holder Mehta Suraya. The applicant in G.A. No. 3 of 2001, has prayed for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1993

Manjushree Minerals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-11-1993

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 111; ;Import Control Order, 1955; ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975; ;Imports and Exports (Control) Act; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995LC451(Calcutta),1993(68)ELT273(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen, ;Sunil Chatterjee and ;S.K. Mehta, Advs.

Ajit K. Sengupta, J.1. This application has been made for modification of the order passed by this Court on 26th August, 1992. To appreciate the scope of the application it is necessary to state the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1997

Kanoria Jute and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Certificate Officer a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-25-1997

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 25

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas330(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen and ;Samit Talukdar, Advs.

ORDERL.N. Ray, Chairman 1. The question involved in this application is whether in the given facts applicant No. 1-company is entitled to the protection of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2005

Pawan JaIn and ors. Vs. Hindusthan Club Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 227, 274, 274(1) and 274(3); ;Companies Rules, 2003 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 9; ;Election Rules

Reported in : (2005)5CompLJ1(Cal),[2005]62SCL610(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen, ;Desal Banerjee, ;P.C. Sen, ;S.B. Mukherjee, Sr. Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. This motion has been taken out for interlocutory relief of order of prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and each of them and/or by their servants and agents or assigns or otherwise from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2001

Rajesh Lakhotia Vs. Smita Lakhotia

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1), 13B and 13B(2);

Reported in : (2001)2CALLT311(HC),2001(2)CHN697,II(2001)DMC624

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhaskar Sen and ;Mr. Aniruddha Basu, Advs.

A. Kabir, J. 1. This appeal was preferred against the judgment and order dated 30th July, 1999, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Calcutta, in Matrimonial Petition No. 5 of 1996, dismissing the appellants' petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

Steel Union Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR2009Cal282

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen, Sr. Adv., ;Samit Talukdar and ;D. Manna, Advs.

1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties at length. We have also perused the papers. Learned single Judge has noted the very brief facts, which may be recapitulated.2. The customs authorities has conducted an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2001

Sarla Gems Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Recons ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15(1), 18 and 18(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas663(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar Sen, ;Amit Chakraborty, ;Dipak Bhattacharjee, ;Niloy Sen and ;Mononita Poddar, Advs.

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The petitioner-company Sarla Gems Ltd. having become sick as defined in the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), was referred on September 8, 1998, under Section 15(1) of the SICA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial