Advanced Search Results
Mr. Mohammed Rafique at Rafik Shaikh Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata Appellate
Mar-01-2011
Land Acquisition
Mr. Bhaskar Sen; Mr. Tirthankar Ghosh Mr. U.S. Menon; Mr. Arabinda Sen, Advs
1. The moot question involved in this litigation is whether the Court is entitled to allow the parties to settle a dispute resulted in a criminal proceeding in respect of a cognizable offence and, if so,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJatindra Kumar Dass Vs. Dhirajlal Vrajlal Kanakia
Kolkata
Aug-30-1974
ContractTenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 1, Rules 6 and 10 - Order 6, Rule 17; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 and 25; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 43
AIR1975Cal123
Bhaskar Sen, Advs.
Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. The undisputed facts in this case are that the plaintiff is the owner of the premises No. 9, Pollock Street, Calcutta, consisting inter alia, of an one-storied godown and that one P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Vir Singh Vs. Sabyasachi Sengupta
Kolkata
Apr-19-2002
Contempt of CourtCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 11, 12, 16, 18 and 34; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 3
(2002)3CALLT56(HC)
Bhaskar Sen and ;Santimoy Panda, Advs.
K.J. Sengupta, J.1. All the three matters have the common origin, as to question of payment and non-payment of the claims and dues of the writ petitioner in terms of the Order dated 9th May, 1996,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mehta Suraya and I.P.M. Industries Limited and ors. Vs. United Investm ...
Kolkata
Feb-05-2002
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 122, 129, 151, 152, 153 and 153A - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 20, Rule 3 - Order 41, Rules 10 and 11; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108, 111 and 115; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act - Sections 13(2), 13(5) and 16; ;Original Side Rule - Rule 7
AIR2002Cal108,(2002)2CALLT272(HC)
Anindya Mitra, ;P.K. Roy and ;S.K. Kapoor, Advs.;B.K. Bachawat and ;Pratap Chatterjee, Advs.;Bhaskar Sen, Adv.
1. The decree in C.S. No. 183 of 1999 was put to execution In G.A. No, 3750 of 2000 by the decree holder Mehta Suraya. The applicant in G.A. No. 3 of 2001, has prayed for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjushree Minerals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Kolkata
Jun-11-1993
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 111; ;Import Control Order, 1955; ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975; ;Imports and Exports (Control) Act; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
1995LC451(Calcutta),1993(68)ELT273(Cal)
Bhaskar Sen, ;Sunil Chatterjee and ;S.K. Mehta, Advs.
Ajit K. Sengupta, J.1. This application has been made for modification of the order passed by this Court on 26th August, 1992. To appreciate the scope of the application it is necessary to state the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanoria Jute and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Certificate Officer a ...
Kolkata
Feb-25-1997
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 25
[1999]95CompCas330(Cal)
Bhaskar Sen and ;Samit Talukdar, Advs.
ORDERL.N. Ray, Chairman 1. The question involved in this application is whether in the given facts applicant No. 1-company is entitled to the protection of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan JaIn and ors. Vs. Hindusthan Club Limited and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-29-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 227, 274, 274(1) and 274(3); ;Companies Rules, 2003 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 9; ;Election Rules
(2005)5CompLJ1(Cal),[2005]62SCL610(Cal)
Bhaskar Sen, ;Desal Banerjee, ;P.C. Sen, ;S.B. Mukherjee, Sr. Advs.
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. This motion has been taken out for interlocutory relief of order of prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and each of them and/or by their servants and agents or assigns or otherwise from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Lakhotia Vs. Smita Lakhotia
Kolkata
Apr-18-2001
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1), 13B and 13B(2);
(2001)2CALLT311(HC),2001(2)CHN697,II(2001)DMC624
Mr. Bhaskar Sen and ;Mr. Aniruddha Basu, Advs.
A. Kabir, J. 1. This appeal was preferred against the judgment and order dated 30th July, 1999, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Calcutta, in Matrimonial Petition No. 5 of 1996, dismissing the appellants' petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSteel Union Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-23-2009
Commercial
AIR2009Cal282
Bhaskar Sen, Sr. Adv., ;Samit Talukdar and ;D. Manna, Advs.
1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties at length. We have also perused the papers. Learned single Judge has noted the very brief facts, which may be recapitulated.2. The customs authorities has conducted an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarla Gems Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Recons ...
Kolkata
Jan-09-2001
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15(1), 18 and 18(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226
[2002]108CompCas663(Cal)
Bhaskar Sen, ;Amit Chakraborty, ;Dipak Bhattacharjee, ;Niloy Sen and ;Mononita Poddar, Advs.
Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The petitioner-company Sarla Gems Ltd. having become sick as defined in the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), was referred on September 8, 1998, under Section 15(1) of the SICA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »