Advanced Search Results
A. Sathyanarayan Vs. Sri K. Selvan
Karnataka
Feb-14-2008
Banking
Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 139, 140 and 142; Money Lenders Act; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 118; General Clauses Act; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 6 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 198, 199 and 200
ILR2008KAR2650; ILR2008(2)Kar2650; 2008(5)KLJ622; 2008(3)KCCR1930; 2008(5)AIRKarR86; AIR2008NOC2544; 2008CrLJ3793; 2008(4)CivilLJ592
K.R. Ashok Kumar, ;K.V. Nanjaiah and ;K. Suresh Reddy, Advs.
Jagannathan, J.1. Whether a counsel is disentitled to appeal- for the complainant on account of the counsel being a creditor to the complainant and whether the Power of Attorney holder is incompetent to file the complaint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Sathyanarayan S/O Suryanarayan Rep. by His G.P.A. Holder, Sri. A.S. ...
Karnataka
Apr-17-2008
BankingCriminal
Negotiable Imtruments Act - Sections 138, 139, 140 and 142; Money Lenders Act; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29 and 30; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 118; General Clauses Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 196, 199 and 200; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2008CriLJ3793; 2008(5)KarLJ622; ILR2008(2)Kar2650; 2008(3)KCCR1930; 2008(5)AIRKarR86; AIR2008NOC2544; 2008(4)CivilLJ592
K.R. Ashok Kumar, ;K.V. Nanjaiah and ;K. Suresh Reddy, Advs.
V. Jagannathan, J.1. Whether a Counsel is disentitled to appear for thus complainant on account of the Counsel being a creditor to the complainant and whether the Power of Attorney holder is incompetent to file the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Sri Ahmed Sharief Abdul Gaffar
Karnataka Dharwad
Mar-09-2018
Land Acquisition
1 CRP No.250/07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE09t h DAY OF MARCH2018R BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.250 OF2007BETWEEN: THE BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, REPTD. BY...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manudas Panka, vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-31-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 6044 OF 2023 CRIME NO.374/2023 OF KASABA POLICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKakinada Municipality Rep. by Its Commissioners Vs. Employees State In ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-20-2009
Labour and Industrial
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 2(9), 2(12), 39, 40, 45, 45(1), 45A, 74, 74(1), 74(4), 75, 75(1), 75(2B), 82, 82(2), 87, 88 and 90; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District Municipalities Act, 1920; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Wage Ceiling Act, 1923; Maternity Act; Fatal Accidents Act; Mines Act, 1952; Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Municipal Subordinate Service Rules; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 32; Andhra Pradesh (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules; Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 31; Employees State Insurance (General) Rules, 1950 - Rules 31 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226
2009(3)ALT623; (2010)ILLJ407AP
S. Nageswara Reddy, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Kakinada Municipality, represented by its Commissioner, filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal under Section 82(2) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the Act' for the purpose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.K.StalIn Vs. the Secretary of Municipal Administration and Water Sup ...
Chennai
Apr-17-2012
Constitution
Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Section 44(2)(a), (b), 24, 9(1), 23(1),; Town Planning Rules. ; Constitution of India - Articles 226
Mr.N.Jothi, Adv.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for(a) writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the second respondent dated 15.12.2011 made in Ne.Ma.Voo.Department Na.Ka.No.LE-4/1883/2011 Subject No.34 which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagarjuna Constructions Co. Ltd. Vs. Sharat Industries Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-22-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 21
[2001]104CompCas602(AP)
B.V. Ramamohan Rao, Adv. for ;C. Sai Kumar, Adv.
A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. This company petition is filed for winding up of the respondent-company i.e., Sharat Industries Limited, previously known as M/s. Sharat Sea Foods Limited under Sections 433(e), (f) and 439 of the Companies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThampi T Joy, vs Union of India
Kerala
Feb-28-2022
WP(C) NO. 35302 OF 2014 & CONNECTED CASES 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 1152 OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Vijayakumar vs Union of India
Kerala
Feb-28-2022
WP(C) NO. 35302 OF 2014 & CONNECTED CASES 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 1152 OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdulla.C vs Union of India
Kerala
Feb-28-2022
WP(C) NO. 35302 OF 2014 & CONNECTED CASES 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 1152 OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »