Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bharat Curio Stores
Allahabad
Oct-28-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B
(1999)152CTR(All)51; [1999]235ITR507(All)
Bharat Ji Agarwal, Adv.
1. Pursuant to the directions of the High Court made under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (briefly, 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred the following question relating to the assessment years 1976-77 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: J.K. Satoh Agricultural Machines Ltd.
Allahabad
Nov-30-2005
CompanySICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 18, 20, 20(1), 22, 22A, 23A and 23B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441, 454, 481, 530, 531, 531A, 532, 533, 536, 537, 542, 543 and 545; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 64; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1993
[2007]138CompCas955(All); (2006)5CompLJ102(All)
V.B. Upadhyay, ;Bharat Ji Agarwal, ;Piyush Agarwal, ;Navin Sinha, ;Vipin Sinha and ;R.P. Agarwal, Advs.
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The Company Application No. 2 of 1990 dated 31.1.1990 was registered, on a recommendation made by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)'Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMittal Coal Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Allahabad
Nov-22-1997
Direct Taxation
(1998)149CTR(All)462
C.S. Agarwal, for the Revenue Bharat Ji Agarwal, for the Assessee
ORDERThe petitioner was assessed to tax by an assessment order dated 30-9-1997 (block assessment) under section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'). As a result of that assessment, a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajeev Maheshwari (Huf)
Allahabad
Jan-11-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]246ITR24(All)
A. N. Mahajan, for the Revenue P. K. Mishra, for Bharat Ji, Agarwal, for the Assessee
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, has under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, stated a case and referred the following question for the opinion of this court :'Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Auto Sales
Allahabad
Nov-22-1999
Direct Taxation
[2001]246ITR494(All)
A. N. Mahajan, for the Revenue P. K. Misra and Bharat Ji Agarwal, for the Assessee
M. C. Agarwal, J.These are two references under section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of a common assessee and relating to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1974-75.The reference in ITR No. 237...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Anil Kumar
Allahabad
Nov-02-1999
Direct Taxation
[2001]246ITR38(All)
Shanibhoo Chopra, for the Revenue P. K. Mishra for Bharat Ji Agarwal, for the Assessee
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-Delhi, in compliance with this court's direction dated 17-7-1980, under section 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, in Wealth-tax Applications Nos. 47, 46 and 48 of 1980 has referred the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Smt. Vibha Agrawal
Allahabad
Dec-11-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN592(All)
Bharat Ji Agarwal and A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue R.S. Agarwal, for the Assessee
ORDERYatindra Singh, J.Heard Sri R.S. Agarwal for the assessee and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal and Sri A.N. Mahajan for the department.2. This is a reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act in which the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Prakash Associates Limited Thru Rahul Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru ...
Allahabad
Mar-29-2010
Other Taxes
Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Substantial questions of law involved in the present writ petition are:A. Whether Government may withdraw the rebate granted in pursuance to notification issued under Section 5 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Winder Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Allahabad
Jul-29-1992
ExciseConstitution
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 35; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
1993(64)ELT388(All)
Bharat Ji Agarwal, Adv.
1. Heard Shri Bharat Ji Agarwal, the learned counsel representing the petitioner and Shri Shishir Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two notices dated 16-11-1990, issued to it under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ...
Allahabad
Nov-15-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254 and 256; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1997]228ITR421(All); [1997]94TAXMAN450(All)
Bharat Ji Agarwal, Adv.
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-Commissioner of Income-tax, Kanpur, challenges an order dated February 25,1987, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, by which it recalled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »