Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: bhagirath das · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 1957

Piara Singh Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-29-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 176 and 528

Reported in : AIR1958P& H430; 1958CriLJ1347

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das and; K.S. Thapar, Advs.

A.N. Bhandari, C.J. 1. The facts of this case have been set out at length in our order of 11-11-1957, and do not need to be recapitulated.2. In his application dated 7-9-1957, the petitioner alleged that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1960

Jiwan Singh and Sons Vs. the Excise and Taxation Officer (Assessing Au ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-06-1960

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1960]11STC540(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das, Adv.

ORDERDua, J.1. This judgment will also dispose of Civil Writ No. 1141 of 1959, which, according to the counsel, involves the same question.2. In Civil Writ No. 1285 of 1959 the petitioners claim to be a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1981

R.K. Garg, Advocate Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-1981

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 2; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228

Reported in : AIR1981SC1382; 1981CriLJ1029; 1981(1)SCALE767; (1981)3SCC166; [1981]3SCR536

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Tarkunde,; S.S. Ray,; K.K. Venugopal,;

Chandrachud, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Section 19(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, ('the Act',) against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh dated November 17, 1980 in Contempt Case (Criminal)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 1962

Khem Chand Vijay Kumar Vs. J.S. Malhotra and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-12-1962

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab General Sales Tax Act - Sections 11(4) and 20

Reported in : AIR1963P& H383; [1963]14STC821(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das and 1; B.K. Jhingan, Advs.

ORDER1. These two writ petitions (Civil Writ Nos. 1473 and 1646 of 1961) have some common features and must be disposed of together, as indeed, the learned counsel also addressed main arguments in Civil Writ No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1960

Firm Sohan Lal Arjan Dass Vs. Firm Banwari Lal Vishwa Nath

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-09-1960

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Sale of Goods Act - Sections 35, 36, 45, 46 and 56

Reported in : AIR1960P& H549

Dua, J. (1) The facts out of which the present appeals (Regular First Appeals Nos. 72 and 104 of 1953) have arisen are briefly stated as follows: Banwari Lal Bishwa Nath, a joint Hindu Family concern,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1955

Mohinder Partap Singh Vs. Director Health Services, Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-30-1955

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Article 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 403

Reported in : AIR1956P& H81

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das and; M.S. Gujral, Advs.

ORDERKapur, J.1. This is a rule obtained by the petitioner Mohinder Partap Singh for the issue of a writ of mandamus against the State directing them to withdraw directions for fresh enquiry and to respondent 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1959

Balwant Rai Kumar Vs. Smt. Amrit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-01-1959

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rule 66(2)

Reported in : AIR1961P& H495

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar, Adv. for Bhagirath Das, Adv.

D.K. Mahajan, J.1. In execution of a decree obtain-ed by Amrit Kaur against Balwant Rai Kumar, land belonging to Balwant Rai Kumar was sold by auction. The land was purchased by the decree-holder on the 14th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1958

Firm H.R. Luxman and Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer, E. Ward, Amritsar and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-30-1958

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(5A) and 46(7)

Reported in : AIR1958P& H395; [1958]34ITR113(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das, Adv.

ORDERL. Gosain, J. 1. The Petitioners Messrs. H.R. Luxman and Company constitute a joint Hindu family firm and are carrying on their business at Amritsar and Calcutta. They were assessed to income-tax for the years 1944-45,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1957

Piara Singh Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-11-1957

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 176

Reported in : AIR1958P& H141; 1958CriLJ673

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das,; Rajinder Sachar and; K.S. Thapar, Ad

A.N. Bhandari, C.J.1. By this petition under Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the petitioner prays that S. Par-tap Singh Kairon, Chief Minister, Punjab, should be committed for contempt of court for interfering with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1959

The Malout Transport Company (Private) Ltd. Vs. the State of Punjab an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C, 33C(1) and 39

Reported in : AIR1959P& H400; [1961(2)FLR131]; (1959)ILLJ641P& H

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Das, Adv.

ORDERR.P. Khosla, J.1. This petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus prohibiting the respondents from recovering the amount of Rs. 16,185/- in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial