Advanced Search Results

Assistant General Manager. Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 11A; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv.

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the file of the 1st respondent herein relating to...

B. Suresh Vs. Assistant General Manager (Hr and Ic), Bharat Heavy Elec ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2013(1)MLJ77

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Balan Haridas, Advocate. For the Respondents: B.T. Seshadri, Advocate.

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the concerned records from the second respondent, quash the...

V.M.Sivaraj Vs. the Registrar of Co-operative Societies and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Co-operative Societies

Acts : Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 81, 87

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has filed these writ petitions challenging the order of the third respondent dated 30.6.2001, insofar as it relates to withholding the petitioner's terminal benefits and also the order of the Deputy Registrar of...

S. Sundaram, Vs. Icici Bank Limited Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Factories Act; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(5), 31(1), 32, 226 and 311(2); Bank of Madura Employees Pension Regulations - Regulations 2, 18, 28, 35, 36, 38 and 39

Reported in : (2007)2LLJ941Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Balan Harida, Adv.

ORDERM.E.N. Patrudu, J.1. Whether a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against the private banker is the first and foremost issue to be decided in this case.2. If the answer is yes then...

Kallakurichi Co-op Sugar Mill Dhina Coolie Thozhilalar Sangam. Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv.

1. The petitioner is a registered Trade Union. The third respondent is a Co-operative Sugar Mill. The NMR workers employed by the third respondent Mill are the Members of the petitioner Union. According to the petitioner...

J.ilango Vs. the Labour Court

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 11-A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv

Prayer in W.P.Nos.33884 and 33885 of 2007: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the file of the first respondent with respect...

P.Jayapal Vs. the Presiding Officer.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 9A; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv.

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the concerned records from the 1st respondent Tribunal, quash the award passed...

M. Selvam Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Chief Postmaster Gener ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ453

Advocate for Appellant : Balan Haridas, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Mishra, J.1. Heard Mr. Balan Haridas for the petitioner, Mrs.Narmada Sampath, Audi. Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2 and Mrs. Jothivani for Respondent No. 3.2. The question in these writ petitions...

P. Muthusamy Vs. Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Limited Rep. by Its Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Rules - Rule 2.22

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ504

Advocate for Appellant : Balan Haridas, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. In W.P. No.18952 of 2003, the petitioner challenges the charge memo, dated 16.09.2002, issued by the 1st respondent/Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Limited (TANCEM), and Order dated 30.06.2003, and seeks to quash the same insofar...

Hallmark Industries Vs. Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 53, 2(14); Workmen's Compensation Act - Section 30

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.R.Murali, learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2, Mrs.S.Jothivani, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent and Mr.V.Subburayan, learned counsel for the 4th and 5th respondents.2....