Advanced Search Results
Bank of Rajasthan Limited Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Patna
Aug-26-1999
CompanyCriminal
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10E and 113; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482
B.V. Kumar, Adv.
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order of cognizance dated October 6, 1997,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Roopali Vijaykumar Padhye W/O Vijayakumar Damodar Padhye Vs. Gove ...
Karnataka
Dec-19-2007
Customs
Companies Act, 1956; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5) and 226; Customs Evaluation Rules, 1986 - Rules 4 to 8; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ordinance, 1988
2009CriLJ4779; 2009(5)KarLJ695
B.V. Kumar, Sr. Counsel for ;Kiran S Javali, Adv.
ORDER1. Smt. Roopali Vijaykumar Padhye, the petitioner herein, has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the Iegality of detention of her husband, Vijaykumar Padhye, vide order No. HD 7 SCF 2007 dated 5.7.2007...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemlal Mahto Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Jharkhand
Jul-29-2003
Commercial
Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(4)JCR309(Jhr)]
B.V. Kumar, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J. 1. Heard Mr. B.V. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Atanu Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the State respondents.2. The Amendment Application filed by the petitioner on 28.7.2000 praying inter alia...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Rajiv Vs. Ferro Scrap Nigam Ltd. and ors.
Jharkhand
Jul-31-2006
Labour and Industrial
CDA Rules - Rule 5(1)
[2006(4)JCR272(Jhr)]
B.V. Kumar, Adv.
R.K. Merathia, J.1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the order dated 24.5.1996 (Annexure-4), passed by Deputy General Manager, Personnel and Administration of respondent No. 1, whereby services of the petitioner was terminated w.e.f....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs, Hyderabad Vs. M/S Tallaja Impex and Others
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Nov-11-2011
Service Tax
For the Appearing Parties : S. Ravichander and D.S. Kanthraj, DRs., Shri B.V. Kumar, Advocate for the respondents, M/s Tallaja Impex, Sri K. Sai Prasad and Sri D. Lakshminarayana, Ms. Anjali Agarwal,
M. Veeraiyan 1.1 Appeal Nos. C/1411/10, C/1412/10 and C/1413/10 are filed by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Nos. 23, 24 and 25/2010 (H-II) Cus dated 31.3.2010 with respondents M/s Tallaja Impex, Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Tirumala Udyog Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-02-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)LC169Tri(Chennai)
1. These appeals relate to the importation of "Plastic scrap" viz.Acrylic plastic scrap and photoframes, Polypropylene and LDPE scrap which were imported under the Advance Licence Scheme issued to the appellants. Under the Advance Licence issued,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Satyendra Dayal Khare
Mumbai
Apr-19-2004
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 114 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154 and 313; Evidence Act, 1860 - Sections 45
2004CriLJ3399
S.R. Chitnis, Spl. Public Prosecutor and ;V.V. Kejriwal, Public Prosecutor
A.S. Aguiar, J.1. This is an appeal by the State from the judgment and order dated 27th February 1997, passed by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate 22nd (sic) Court, Andheri, Bombay, acquitting the accused Satyendra Dayal Khare,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSP Tripathi IO NCB Vs. Yudhister Kumar Alias Y Kumar and Others
Delhi
Sep-22-2015
Education
1. These appeals have been preferred on behalf of the Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi, against the common judgment and order dated 06.05.1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsea Brown Boveri Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
May-29-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(62)ECC719
1. This appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 152/97, dated 28-4-1997 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Bangalore upholding the Order-in-Original No. 166/95, dated 4-7-1995 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise IX Division, Bangalore in regard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Granites Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-23-2000
Land Acquisition
(2000)(71)ECC539
Shri. B.V. Kumar
1. To get this appeal heard, the appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 2,01,11,727/-under the Customs Act, 1962 and Rs 2,40,356/- under the Central Excise Act, 1944, Interest @ 20% on the Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »