Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b t singh · Page 1 of about 88 results (0.160 seconds)

Feb 01 1995

Sita Ram Pandey Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437

Reported in : 1995(32)DRJ722

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; Aman Lekhi and; B.T. Singh, Advs

Mohd. Sharnim, J.(1) This is an application by the petitioner for release on bail. (2) Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Lekhi, Senior Advocate, has contended that the petitioner is innocent. He has been falsely implicated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1986

State Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-1986

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313(3); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1986CriLJ1527; 1986(11)DRJ1

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Singh and; D.C. Mathur, Advs

Malik Sharief-ud-din, J. (1) This appeal is again it the acquittal recorded by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, on 8-5-85 in favor of the respondent under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1985

Prabhu Dayal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1986CriLJ383; 1986(1)Crimes3; 1986(10)DRJ147

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Bhagat,; Rajeev Sharma and; B.T. Singh, Advs

R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) The appellant Prabhu Dayal has been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. Dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence, he has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 30 1978

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Het Ram and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-1978

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7

Reported in : 15(1979)DLT195

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Singh and; Nemo, Advs

Dalip K. Kapur, J.(1) This is a revisional petition under the criminal procedure code (Section 40 read with Section 397) arising out of the conviction of the respondent under Section 7 read with Section 16 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1993

Umed Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ381

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Andley and; B.T. Singh, Advs

Sat Pal, J. (1) This is a petition under section 439 Criminal Procedure Code . for grant bail on behalf of the petitioner, Uimed Singh. The case of the prosecution is that on the night intervening...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1993

Lawrance Singh Rana Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-10-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439

Reported in : 1993(26)DRJ249

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Singh and; H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Advs

Sat Pal, J. (1) The present petition is for grant of bail under section 439 Criminal Procedure Code.(2) Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that on 10th May, 1992 some police officers led by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2005

Robil Shah @ Kale and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-04-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 307 and 308; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100 and 161

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2630; 117(2005)DLT106; 2005(79)DRJ661

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Singh,; A.S. Anand and; M.K. Jha, Advs.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Appellant Sultan Singh, Jai Kumar and Rajender are brothers. Appellant Robin Shah @ Kale is the son of Sultan Singh. Appellant Deepak is the son of Rajender. All of them were charged of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1978

Municipal Corporation Vs. Mahbir

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1978

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7

Reported in : 1978RLR365

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Singh and; N.K. Parmar, Advs

V.D. Misra, J.(1) This revision for enhancement of sentence is directed against the judgment of Mr. J.D. Kapoor, Metropolitan Magistrate, who awarded a sentence of fine of Rs. 1,000.00 only for an offence under Section 7/16,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1976

Bans Raj Vs. State, Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-19-1976

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16 and 19(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 22

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi214

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur,; Charanjit Talwar and; B.T. Singh, Advs

V.D. Misra (1) This revision is directed against the judgment of an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, upholding the conviction of the petitioner under section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1977

Padam Chand JaIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-26-1977

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi116

Advocate for Appellant : Gulshan Rai,; R.N. Tikku and; B.T. Singh, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) The petitioner (Padam Chand Jain) is the father of Mukat Raj Jain, who has preferred this Criminal Revision against his conviction under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.