Advanced Search Results

Engineering Investments P. Ltd. Vs. Bharath Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24(1)

Reported in : AIR1983Mad1

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;A.S. Kailasam and ;R.Thiagarajan, Advs.;B.T. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. Petition is filled under Section 24(1)(b)(i) of the Civil P.C. for withdrawing the appeal in A.S. No.297 of 1981 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court for declaration that the Bank Guarantees...

Union of India, Eastern Railway and anr. Vs. St. Joseph Textiles, Karu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77(1), 77(2) and 77(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1985Mad360; (1985)1MLJ274

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Seshadri, Adv.

Mohan, J. 1. Defendants I and 2, the union of India, Eastern Railway by its General Manager at Calcutta and the Union of India Southern Railway by its General Manager, Park Town, Madras are the appellants...

The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Ranganathaswami Devasthanam Vs. His Ho ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trust and Societies

Reported in : (1989)2MLJ54

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.T.Seshadri

Bellie, J.1. The controversy in these two Letters Patent Appeals is as to the requirement of issue of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The two appeals arise out of one suit....

B. Suresh Vs. Assistant General Manager (Hr and Ic), Bharat Heavy Elec ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2013(1)MLJ77

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Balan Haridas, Advocate. For the Respondents: B.T. Seshadri, Advocate.

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the concerned records from the second respondent, quash the...

BashruddIn Vs. P. Somasundaram

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 10 (3), 25; Delhi and Ajmir Rent Control Act, 1952 -- Sections 35;

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC723

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.T. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. The landlord is the revision petitioner. He sought the eviction of the respondent/tenant on the grounds of wilful default and own occupation. The ground of wilful default has been found against the landlord by both...

Dr. Kamala Dakshinamurthi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees Represented b ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ604

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.T. Seshadri

Lakshmanan, J.1. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 have filed the above suit in a representative capacity after obtaining necessary permission from this Court under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In Appln. No....

T.P.Latha at Hemalatha and ors. Vs. P.Sukumar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 20, 16 (c), 22 (1) (a) (b); Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Section 96 Forms 47 and 48

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.T.Seshadri, Adv.

Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree, dated 27.04.2009 passed in O.S.No.84 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Erode.K.Mohan Ram, J.,1....

United India Insurance Company Ltd. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. Muth ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilInsurance

Acts : Transport of Property Act - Sections 6

Reported in : 2004ACJ1780; AIR2003Mad284; (2003)1MLJ441

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Seshadri, Adv. for ;R. Vedantham, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. The defendants 1 and 2 are the legal heirs of of one K.R. Raman who carried on the goods transport business in the name and style, Sri Velmurugan...

A. Kothandapani and ors. Vs. Sampathkumar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1987Mad204; (1987)IMLJ297

Advocate for Appellant : B.T. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an appeal under Sec. 39 of the Arbitration Act by the defendants in O. S.227 of 1984 on the file of the court of Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet against the dismissal of their application...

Sukra Shoe Fabric Represented by Its Partner, Srinivasa Rajan Vs. Uco ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionContract

Reported in : (1991)27MLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.T. Seshadri

ORDERKanakaraj, J.1. The petitioner is a firm of exporter of leather garments and footwear. The petitioner applied to the respondent bank for the grant of a term loan facility, Packing Credit facility and Foreign Bills Discount...