Advanced Search Results

K. Thirupathi Vs. District Magistrate and District Collector and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 226

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4389

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, Senior Counsel as Amicus Curie;M. Patturajan, Adv. in H.C.P. No. 171 of 2005, ;R. Ramasamy, Adv. in H.C.P. No. 188 of 2005, ;K. Porkodikannan and ;R. Rajagopal, Advs. in H.C.P. No. 198 o

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. These batch of Habeas Corpus Petitions came before this Bench by way of Reference by a Division Bench of this Court dated 11.8.2005. The order of Reference is as follows:'(a) In preventive detention...

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 16, 16(2), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 17(1), 17A, 17(1A), 17(B), 30, 35, 35(B), 35O, 69, 271(1), 273A, 276C, 276CC, 277 and 279; Income Tax Act - Sections 120B, 139(1), 277 and 278E; Limitation Act, 1974; Mines Act - Sections 66; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190, 190(1), 192, 200-203, 204, 245(2), 309, 397, 397(1), 401, 482 and 483; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; Wealth Tax Rules - Rule 3(1); Mines Regulations - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3114; (2009)222CTR(Mad)470; [2009]309ITR277(Mad); [2009]179TAXMAN212(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, Sr. Counsel for A. Navaneethakrishnan, Adv. in Crl.O.P. and ;Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sr. Counsel for A. Navaneethakrishnan, Adv.

ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J.1. Since common questions arise for consideration in the above Criminal Original Petition and in the above Criminal Revision Case both the cases are disposed of by this common order.2. The brief facts...

The State Vs. Gangaraman and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997CriLJ510

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, Public Prosecutor

1. This appeal filed by the Food Inspector, Corporation of Coimbatore, through the Public Prosecutor, is directed against the judgment in C.A. No. 287 of 1985 on the file of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore,...

Ayyanar and Allimuthu Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC174

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, S.C. for ;N.A. Ravindran, Adv. for Appellant No. 1 and ;S. Shanmugavelayutham, Adv. for Appeallant No. 2

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Ayyanar (A1) and Allimuthu (A2) were tried for the offences under Sections 341 and 302 read with 34 I.P.C. The trial Court, ultimately, convicted both the accused finding them guilty in respect of...

N.R. Ramakoti, and anr. Vs. State Rep by the Inspector of Police (Crim ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 482

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.B. Sriramulu, Adv.

1. The petitions are filed seeking a direction to call for the records in C.C.No.2 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No,I, Poonamallee and quash the same.2. The petitioner in both the...

E.Ganesan Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(1)(e), 13(2), 5(1)(e); Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 374

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.B.Sriramulu, Adv.

Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code against the judgment of the learned Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, Chennai made in C.C.No. 186 of 1997 dated 21.8.2002 convicting the appellant herein...

V. Kasi Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vigil ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 20; General Clauses Act - Sections 26

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3592

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, Sr. Counsel

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard.2. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the accused against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 15.7.1996, made in C.C. No. 75 of 1991 of the learned I Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial...

S. Balasubramaninan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Section 29; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482, 377, 401(1), 386, 397, 561-A, 378, 438(1), 399(3); Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) - Section 151 ; Principal Act - 25-A, 54-A, 291-A, 311-A, 378; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 20

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.B. Kumar, Adv

Revisions filed under Sec.397 r/w Sec.401 Cr.P.C against the judgment dated 6.2.2008 in R.C.No.34 of 2005 and Appeal No.289 of 2003 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-I), Chennai confirming the...

In Re: Rajendran and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 332, 342, 365 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 317

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1956

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Sr. Counsel, for ;R. Karthikeyan, ;M/s D. Veerasekaran and ;Nainar Mohammed, ;M/s. P. Sivathanu, ;Manoharan and ;M. Jagadeesan, Advs., ;K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;M/s. V. Rathi

Arunachalam, J.1. A storm, not one natural, had blown over the campus, which accommodates the Courts of certain Metropolitan Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates, in Saidapet on 26-7-1995. The unusual impact of the storm had led to...

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 336, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.M. Ramesh, Adv.

Arunachalam, J.1. Petitioner Arumugam has been detained as a 'goonda' under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, in pursuance of an order of detention dated 9-7-1993 passed by the first respondent. Commissioner of Police, Madras City,...