Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Kumar and anr. Vs. Furu Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 30, 32, 33, 17, 14; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 17; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 12; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114

1. Leave granted. For convenience parties will also be referred by their ranks in the suit or by name. 2. The appellants - two brothers, are the co-owners with equal shares, in lands measuring in all...

Alim Ullah (In Jail) Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4110

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Saran, ;Purushottam Lal and ;R.B. Sharma, Advs. (A.C.)

M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant is one Alim Ullah who is aggrieved by judgment and order dated 30-3-1981 passed in Sessions Trial No'. 2 of 1981 by Sri U. S. Tripathi, the then IX Additional Sessions...

Rajen Limboo Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1903

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sharma, Adv.

N. Surjamani Singh, J.1. The appellant, namely, Rajen Limboo alias Purkey Subha has been convicted for commission of the offence under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of...

Surjay Bdr. Darjee Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 392; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 306, 306(4), 308, 308(4) and 308(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337, 339 and 339A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2163

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sharma, Sr. Counsel assisted by; B. Pokhrel, Adv.

A.P. Subba, J.1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the learned Court of Session Judge (South and West) in S.T. Case No. 12 of 2004 convicting the appellant herein and...

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Sharma, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

C.K. Buch, J.1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code'), the petitioner-orig.accused no. 2 of Criminal Case...

M/S. Aarti Steels Limited, Odisha Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Co ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Sanjay Sen, Rajiv Yadav and Ms. Shikha Ohri, Advocates. For the Respondents: R2 - R.B. Sharma, R1 - Rutwik Panda, Advocates.

P.S. DATTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER, J. 1. Was the tariff in respect of the appellant properly determined according to the law? Did not the order impugned amount to ad hocism? These are the questions vehemently spread out...

Dil Bahadur Tamang Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 449

Reported in : 2005CriLJ786

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sharma, Adv.

Ripusudan Dayal, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18-8-2001 by the learned Sessions Judge, East and North Sikkim rendered in Criminal Case No. 4 of 1998 whereby the appellant Dil Bahadur Tamang was...

Umesh Thakur Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 302 and 304; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 207, 302 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2774

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sharma and; D.R. Thapa, Advs.

Ripusudan Dayal, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Division, Slkkim convicting the appellant uner Section 302 IPC and sentencing him to imprisonment for life with...

Vaishali Power Generating Co. Ltd Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory C ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s): Mr. M. G. Ramachandran, Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent(s): R2, Mr. R. B. Sharma, BSEB, Resp.

Ms. Swapna Seshadri appearing for the appellant says that the present appeal is against the tariff order for the period of 8/9/06 to 31/3/09 which inter alia required the appellant to file revised petition at the...

Shri Narsudas Ramchandra Mehta District Raigad Vs. Shri (Dr.) Vijay Ke ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.B. Sharma –Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. A.V. Patwardhan-Advocate for the Respondent.

Per Justice Shri B.B. Vagyani, Honble President 1. Feeling dissatisfied with the dismissal order dated 25/11/1998 passed by District Consumer Forum, Raigad, original complainant in consumer complaint no.38/1994 has come up in appeal. 2. We heard...