Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b s singh · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.363 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 2008

Ainul Hoque @ Inul Hoque Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-28-2008

Subject : Criminal

H.N. Sarma, J.1. This Criminal Appeal is directed challenging the judgment and order dated 25.1.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Darrang, in Sessions Case No. 48 (D) 2001, convicting and sentencing the accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1999

Purbhaji S/O Baba and Others Vs. Tuljaram S/O Kasturchand Rathod and A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-1999

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 22, Rule 4; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Acts, 1948 - Sections 40

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR569; 2000(1)BomCR884

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Lakhkar, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Mhase, J.1. This Civil Revision Application has been filed challenging the order of the III Additional District Judge, Nanded in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 207 of 1986 decided on 21-4-1989.2. The matter arises out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2013

Sunil Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2013

Subject : Education

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6523/2013 Date of Decision:10. h October, 2013 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Kaul and Mr.R.S.Kaushik, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 1995

Malla Venkataswamy Mandadi and anr. Vs. Sreepuram Munemma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1995

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : 1995(3)ALT92

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Narayana, Adv.

N.Y. Hanumanthappa, J.1. This is a second appeal by Defendants 3 and 4 in O.S.No. 493/74 on the file of the District Munsif, Srikalahasti. The suit Was filed for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1984

Tirath Singh Vs. Bal Kisan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-04-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rule 4 and 4(3)

Reported in : AIR1984P& H373

1. This is plaintiff's second appeal whose suit was dismissed by the trial Court and the appeal filed by him was dismissed as incompetent having been filed against a dead person.2. The appellant filed the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1993

Mohd. Safdar Shareef (Died) Per L.Rs. and ors. Vs. Mohammed Ali (Died) ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-03-1993

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 4 and 11

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT522

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venugopal Reddy, ;M. Chandrasekhara Reddy and ;R. Vijayanandan Reddy, Advs.

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. The question involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is, whether a Division Bench hearing the Letters Patent Appeal can set aside the Judgment and remand the matter to the learned single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1962

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. T.R. Kalla, Asst. Sr. Manager and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-19-1962

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1963CriLJ6

S.N. Katju, J.1. I see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Court below.2. It appears that the fitness certificate of the opposite-parties' vehicle was to expire on the 19th January, 1961. As...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2003

Md. Tauquir Alam Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-09-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Law; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR640(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar, Adv.

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Petitioner filed this writ application seeking direction upon the respondents, Jharkhand State Electricity Board and its officers to accept the application of the petitioner for giving him new electric connection in the premises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1992

State of U.P. Vs. Hanif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1992

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 8, 10 and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1992SC1121; 1992CriLJ1429; 1992(2)Crimes14(SC); JT1992(2)SC513; 1992(1)KLT760(SC); 1992(1)SCALE753; (1992)3SCC100; [1992]2SCR371

Advocate for Appellant : Vikrant Yadav,; R.C. Verma and; A.S. Pundir, Advs

ORDERK.Ramaswamy, J.1. The respondent was convicted for an offence under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 37 of 1954, for short 'the Act', and was sentenced to undergo 6...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2002

Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Rajpal Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1980 - Rule 12; Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 46(4); Delhi Police Act - Sections 21(1) and 21(3); Constitution of India - Article 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT385; 2002(64)DRJ181; 2003(1)SLJ130(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Bagai, Adv

S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Interpretation of Rule 12 of the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1980 is in question in this writ petition which arises out of a judgment and order dated 4th February 2000 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial