Advanced Search Results
Smt. Gian Kaur Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-1996
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 306 and 309; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Suicide Act, 1961; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360;
AIR1996SC1257; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)102; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)535; 1996(2)BLJR809; 1996CriLJ1660; 1996(1)CTC454; (1996)2GLR563; (1996)2GLR563; JT1996(3)SC339; 1996(2)SCALE881; (1996)2S
K.T.S. Tulsi,; B.S. Malik,; K.N. Shukla,;
ORDER1. Leave granted in special leave petitions.2. The appellants Gian Kaur and her husband Harbans Singh were convicted by the Trial Court under Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and each sentenced to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and ors. Vs. Jagdish and Harpal
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-2010
Criminal
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59; Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955; West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992; State Re-organisation Act; Prison Rules; Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 1958 - Rules 20 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 401, 432, 432(1), 433 and 433A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 53A, 54, 55, 57, 302, 148 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161
2010(2)SCALE302
Gopal Subramanium, Sol. Genl. of India (A.C.),; B.S. Malik, Sr. Adv.,;
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. This matter has come up before us upon reference having been made by a Two-Judge Bench vide order dated 04.11.2009 upon noticing an inconsistency in the views expressed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatbir Singh and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Delhi
Sep-18-2002
Property
Constitution of India - Articles 40, 226 and 243G; East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14(1) and 14(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 156
100(2002)DLT85; 2003(66)DRJ775
B.S. Malik, Sr. Adv. and; R.S. Rana, Adv; Avnish Ahlawat
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Whether the provisions of East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, is still in force and in any event has been impliedly repealed by Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pavitar Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-27-1987
Criminal
1988CriLJ1052
Mr. B. S. Malik
ORDERI.S. Tiwana, J.1. The petitioner who claims to be less than 17 years of age on the date of crime on being sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302, I.P.C. on Mar. 12, 1980, prays that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ali Vs. Azad Mohd.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-01-1999
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951; High Court Judges(Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Sections 23-A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10
AIR1999SC3429; JT1999(6)SC555; 1999(5)SCALE370; (1999)8SCC538; [1999]Supp2SCR199; 1999(2)LC1405(SC)
B.S. Malik,; Altaf Hussain and; K.S. Chauhan, Advs
ORDER1. The election petition filed by the appellant challenging the election of the respondent was dismissed by the learned Election Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on the preliminary issue of limitation without...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Joti Builders and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Dec-18-1972
Constitution
Delhi Bricks (Distribution, Sale, Movement and Price) Control Order, 1963; East Punjab, Control of Bricks Supplies Act, 1949 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
ILR1973Delhi531
B.S. Malik and; P.N. Tiwari, Advs
S.N. Andley, J.(1) This writ petition has been filed by 28 brickkiln owners, who are manufacturing bricks in the Union Territory of Delhi, to challenge various provisions of the Delhi Bricks (Distribution, Sale Movement and Price)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishan Singh Kundu Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-31-1989
Criminal
1989CriLJ1309
M.R. Agnihotri, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution which has been brought before us in the nature of Public Interest Litigation by Mr. Krishan Singh Kundu a practising Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeople's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi)
Supreme Court of India
Dec-16-2003
Constitution
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 1(4), 2, 2(1), 3 to 9, 10, 10(2), 11, 12, 14, 18 to 24, 26, 27, 29 to 33, 36 to 53 and 60; Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2(1), 5, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 15, 15(2), 16, 17, 18 and 20; Jammu Kashmir Constitution Act, 1996 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 39 and 91; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 120B; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 20, 20(3), 21, 226 and 227; Evidence Act - Sections 126; Press Council Act, 1978 - Sections 15(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 13(1); Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 - Sections 37; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10
AIR2004SC456; 2004(1)CTC241; JT2003(10)SC70; 2003(10)SCALE96; (2004)9SCC580
Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General,; Rajinder Sachhar,; Anil B
S. Rajendra Babu, J.W.P.(C) No. 389/2002 & W.P.(Crl) No. 89/2002:1. In this batch of Writ Petitions before us the Constitutional validity of various provisions of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (hereinafter POTA) is in challenge.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLife Convict Bengal @ Khoka @ Prasanta Sen Vs. B.K. Srivastava and Oth ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2013
Criminal
West Bengal Act - Section 2(c); Constitution of India - Article 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 57
P. Sathasivam, J.1) The petitioner - a life convict has filed this contempt petition against the respondents - the State of West Bengal and its officers for disobeying the order dated 24.11.2010 passed by this Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRahul Kanwal Vs. Brig. P.K.Tikoo and anr
Jammu and Kashmir
Feb-08-2013
MRTP
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. 561-A 22.OF 201.Rahul Kanwal Petitioners Brig. P.K.Tikoo and anr Respondent !Mr. D.S.Thakur, Sr.Adv., with Sh. Inderjeet Gupta, Advocate ^Mr. U.K.Jalali Sr. Advocate withMrs. Shivani Jalali, Adv Honble Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »