Advanced Search Results

Moturu Nalini Kanth Vs. Gainedi Kaliprasad (dead Through Lrs.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO __ DEVASA & CO.

2023 INSC1004Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2435 OF2010Moturu Nalini Kanth … Appellant Versus Gainedi Kaliprasad (dead, through LRs.) … Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KUMAR, J1 Moturu Nalini Kanth, then a...

K.V. Narasimulu Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1971]27STC178(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Prasada Rao, Adv.

Obul Reddi, J. 1. This revision raises an interesting question whether the wooden casings, reapers and 'gattis' come within the meaning of 'all other accessories of electrical goods' mentioned in item 37 of the First Schedule...

Pilla Satyanarayana Vs. Vadaparthi Ramabrahmam

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR1960AP230

Advocate for Appellant : P. Ramachandra Rao and ;B. Prasada Rao, Advs.

Satyanarayana Raju, J.1. The following question has been referred to the full Bench :'What is the meaning to be given to words give such security for the performance of the decree' in the Proviso to Section...

In Re: Nookiah

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 411A, 434, 435, 438 and 439

Reported in : AIR1954Mad918; (1954)IIMLJ406

Advocate for Appellant : O. Chinnapa Reddi and ;B. Prasada Rao, Advs.;N. Koteswara Rao, Adv. for ;State Prosecutor

1. The first accused in case No. 14 of the Fourth Criminal Sessions of 1953 was charged with two offences, The first was under Section 332, I.P.C., in that he voluntarily caused hurt to a public...

In Re: Sainambu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras Criminal Rules of Practice - Rule 85; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR1953Mad564; (1953)IMLJ467

Advocate for Appellant : B. Prasada Rao, Amicus Curiae

1. The appellant has been found guilty of an offence under Section 302, Penal Code, for having murdered, on 6-8-1951, a girl by name Umal Regina, aged 7 years, by cutting her with an 'aruval', and...

Gift-tax Officer Vs. Bhupati Veerabhadra Rao

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1984)9ITD618(Hyd.)

1. These appeals by the revenue relate to gift-tax assessments. The assessment year involved in all these appeals is 1979-80. The assessees in all these appeals are co-owners of certain properties and they are also related...

Mahendra R. Saraf and ors. Vs. Goldstone Technologies Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1) 9, 10, 11, 11(6), 33 and 36; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules, 1996 - Rule 3(1); Madras High Court (Jurisdictional Limit) Act, 1927; Madras Civil Court Act, 1873; Indian Companies Act; Indian Divorce Act; Representation of Peoples Act

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD824; 2002(1)ALT516

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Waghray, Adv.

1. The petitioners filed the above application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 1996. The petitioners were holding 100% of the...

K. Sudhakar Gupta Vs. Electro thermics (Pvt) Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(2)

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD855; [2004]122CompCas625(AP); [2003]47SCL727(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Kodanda Ram, Adv. in CP Nos. 112 of 2001 and ;V.S. Raju, Adv. in CA Nos. 665 of 2001 and 539 of 2002

ORDERS. Ananda Reddy, J.1. This Company Petition is filed under Section 391, read with Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') seeking sanction of the scheme of arrangement/ compromise with...

B. Prasada Rao Vs. Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. This complaint was presented on 14.11.1996 by one B. Prasada Rao stating that he had made three fixed deposits with the opposite party Bank, (1) of Rs. 3,03,403/- “as of” 19.8.1995...

R and R Tech Mach Limited Vs. Chief Executive Officer, New Okhla Indus ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The present information is filed by M/s R and R Tech Mach Limited (hereinafter referred to as œInformant?) on 17.02.2014 under section 19(1) (a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as œthe Act?)...