Advanced Search Results

Pudusseri Vadakkethil Vikraman Alias Kunhikuttan Nair Vs. V. Krishnan ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1953Mad396; (1952)IMLJ452

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker, Adv.

ORDERBasheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. The defendant who is the petitioner in tins civil revision petition seeks to revise the order of the Small Cause Judge who gave a decree in favour of the plaintiff under the...

Union of India Vs. V. Sriharan @ ,Murugan and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Shanti Bhushan

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) No.48 OF2014Union of India …Petitioner VERSUS V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors. …Respondents With Writ Petition (Crl.) No.185/2014 Writ Petition (Crl.) No.150/2014 Writ...

In Re: Mohamed Rahimullah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Reported in : AIR1947Mad461; (1947)1MLJ70

ORDERYahya Ali, J.1. This is a reference by the Chief Presidency Magistrate, under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, made in the following circumstances. Kurshid Begum filed an application under Section 488 of the...

Mohamad BIn B Pocker Vs. the Reserve Bank of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 14TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 29360 of 2012 (T) PETITIONER: ------------ MOHAMAD BIN B POCKER AGED...

Mammootty Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 361

Reported in : AIR1958Ker4; 1958CriLJ31

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker,; M. Moosakutty and; P.K. Shamsudin, Advs.

Raman Nayar, J.1. The appellant, who was the 1st accused at the trial, has been convicted under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment tor three years. His fellow accused,...

Kadalundi Pulikkalakath Saidalayi Thangal Vs. Thrikkannur Pulathottath ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Malabar Tenancy Act, 1930 - Sections 20, 21, 21(1), 43 and 43(1)

Reported in : AIR1951Mad670; (1950)IIMLJ767

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker, Adv.

Raghava Rao, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit under Section 21, Malabar Tenancy Act (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) for restoration of possession of land which the pltf. haying held...

Kannangara Ismail Vs. Palayat Kappadakkal Pavu Amma and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 153 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1955Mad644; (1955)2MLJ184

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker, Adv.

Govinda Menon, J.1. The 11th defendant in O. S. No. 1178 of 1945 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Kozhikode out of which this second appcfil arises is the appellant. The suit was for...

Vasudevan and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1959Ker67a; (1959)IILLJ610Ker

Advocate for Appellant : T.C. Raghavan, Adv.,; B. Pocker,; K.M. Seethy and;

M.S. Menon, J. 1. These petitions wore heard together. They challenge the validity of a notification of the Government of Kerala dated 26-2-1958 under Section 3(1)(a)of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Central Act XI of 1948)....

Moosa Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 31 and 226

Reported in : AIR1960Ker355

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker and; B. Moosakutty, Advs.

Ansari, J. 1. This appeal arises from the order by a learned judge of this Court, dismissing the appellant's petition under Art, 226 of the Constitution. The facts culminating in the order are shortly these :...

H.S. Vodayar Vs. the Vijaya Bank Ltd. by Its Secretary B. Mahabala She ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 58, 58(2) and 63

Reported in : AIR1951Mad321; (1950)2MLJ492

Advocate for Appellant : B. Pocker and ;A. Atchuthan Nambiar, Advs.

ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This revision petition raises an interesting question of law, namely, whether a mofuasil Court can under Section 94(e), Civil P. C., or Order 21, Rule 68 (2), Civil P. C., or Section 151,...