Advanced Search Results
Smt. Bimala Devi and ors. Vs. Patitapaban Dev and ors.
Orissa
Feb-08-1973
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Articles 122 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151
AIR1973Ori169
B. Patnaik, Adv.
G.K. Misra, C.J. 1. Facts may be stated in brief. First Appeal No. 127 of 1971 was filed with 4 defects. Defects 1 to 3 were removed before the Registrar on 10-1-1972 by order No. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGandharba Pal Vs. Bulei Sethi and ors.
Orissa
Feb-07-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 41, Rules 17, 17(1) and 24
2005(I)OLR657
B. Patnaik, ;P.K. Deo and ;S.K. Swain, Advs.
A.K. Patnaik, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short C.P.C.).2. The facts for disposal of this appeal briefly are that the appellant herein filed T.S. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rebati Dei Vs. Kunja Bihari Mohapatra and ors.
Orissa
Sep-08-1998
PropertyCivil
Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1951 - Sections 6 and 7
1998(II)OLR543
B. Patnaik, Adv.
D.M. Patnaik, J.1. Plaintiff's suit for declaration of title, confirmation of possession and/or in the alternative for recovery of possession and injunction in respect of disputed plot No. 1759 measuring Ac. 0.70 decimals and plot No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Biharilal Agarwala Vs. Ramesh Kumar Rath and ors.
Orissa
Sep-16-1982
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 22, Rule 2 - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1983Ori45; 54(1982)CLT549
B. Patnaik and ;D. Patnaik, Advs.
ORDERR.C. Patnaik, J.1. This revision is directed against an order directing abatement of a proceeding under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Civil P. C. for getting aside an ex parte decree.2. Opposite Parties 1 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBikal SwaIn Vs. Iswar Swain
Orissa
Nov-17-1958
Property
Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 44
AIR1959Ori173
D. Mohanti and ;B. Patnaik, Advs.
Das, J. 1. The only question of law raised in this appeal is, of the plaintiff was entitled to any relief under Section 4 of the Partition Act (Act No. 4 of 1895). The facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarada Maharana Vs. Pramila Kumari Dei
Orissa
Jun-22-2001
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 1, Rule 41 - Order 41, Rule 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45
AIR2002Ori33
B. Pattnaik, ;N.P. Patnaik, ;B. Patnaik and ;N.C. Patnaik, Avs.
P.K. Mohanty, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant against the confirming judgment of the Courts below dismissing the suit for declaration.2. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for declaration that the sale deed executed by Dharamu Maharana...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Puri Vs. Kamala Kanta Das
Orissa
May-01-1979
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 23(2); Orissa Land Acquisition Act, 1948
AIR1979Ori147; 47(1979)CLT613
G.B. Patnaik, Addl. Govt. Adv.
R.N. Misra, J. 1. The Collector of Puri has carried this appeal against the award of the learned District Judge of Puri passed under Orissa Act 18 of 1948.2. Under three separate notifications issued under Orissa...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurusottam Pani Vs. Dhruba Charan Panda and ors.
Orissa
Apr-29-1975
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 145 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 43
AIR1976Ori8
B. Patnaik and ;B.B. Patnaik, Advs.
ORDERG.K. Misra, C.J. 1. Opposite party No. 3 filed a suit on a promissory note for recovery of dues against opposite parties 1 and 2. The rice huller machine belonging to opposite parties 1 and 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Bihar Vs. Lalu Prasad and ors.
Patna
Sep-20-2007
Criminal
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.1. The present Government appeal has been filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the State of Bihar against the Judgment and order of acquittal dated 18.12.2006 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo Impex Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-13-1968
Sales Tax
[1968]22STC66(Cal)
B.R. Jhunjhunwala and ; Arun Prokash Sarkar, Advs.
D. Basu, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 25th February, 1961, passed by respondent No. 2 (Assistant Commissioner), which is at annexure H, directing a fresh assessment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »