Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b p verma · Page 1 of about 61 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1993

indrajeet Mishra Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-05-1993

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Bihar Panchayat Conduct of Business of Panchayat Rules, 1960 - Rule 26

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Verma, M.S.K. Sinha, Bhola Prasad and Pramod Mishra, Advs.

Aftab Alam, J. 1. A Mukhiya has the right to preside over a meeting of the executive committee of the Gram Panchayat in terms of Rule 20 of the Bihar Conduct of Business of Panchayat Rules,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2005

Mukhlal Ram Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-29-2005

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 48E, 48E(1), 48E(3), 48E(4), 48E(6) and 48E(7); Bihar Tenancy Rules, 1886 - Rule 2

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Verma, Sr. Adv., G.D. Yadav, Yogendra Kumar and Durgesh Kumar, Advs.

Mridula Mishra, J. 1. The petitioner, in this application, has questioned the legality of an order, dated 30.9.2002, passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bikramganj, Rohtas, in purported exercise of power under Section 48-E of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2019

The State of Bihar Vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Singh

Civil Appeal No…… of 2019 @ SLP(C)No.20 of 2018 etc. 1 State of Bihar and Ors. vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee, Munger & Ors. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 22 2005

Vijendra Kumar Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-22-2005

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 174, 313, 374(2) and 428; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1984 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : 2(2006)DMC568

Advocate for Appellant : Shambhoo Singh, Adv.

Satya Prakash Pathak, J.1. Appellant Vijendra Kumar has filed this appeal under Section 374, Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.7.2003 passed by learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1998

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-01-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

P.K. Deb, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30.8.1986 passed by the then Additional Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhanbad in Money Suit No. 6 of 1982, whereby the plaintiffs suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1999

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-18-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Mehta

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioner, M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate, writ for quashing the direction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2003

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Urmila Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-04-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 163A and 167; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : 2004ACJ1507; [2003(97)FLR530]; (2003)IIILLJ178All

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar, Adv.

S.P. Srivastava, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Insurer-appellant and Shri B.P. Verma, learned counsel for the claimants-respondents.2. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act feeling...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1999

Uma Prasad Vs. Smt. Padmawati and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-20-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ502

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Das, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure the plaintiff-appellant has called in question the propriety of the judgment and decree dated 30-7-1998 passed by the learned District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2002

Ram Naumi Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Oct-04-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(2A)

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR728]

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Sinha, Sr. Adv. and; J.K. Kha, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Petitioner has challenged the Award passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 Dhanbad in 11 of 1991, whereby he has answered the reference against the petitioner-workman.2. The Central Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2010

The State of Bihar, and ors. Vs. Sri Lakshmi Narayan Prasad.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-20-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manu Shankar Mishra; Kalpana Singh, Advs.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned & B.P. Verma, JJ counsel for the respondent.2. State of Bihar and its concerned officials have preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial