Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Dnyaneshwar S/O Gangadhar Parkhi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 5, Rule 19A - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 27, Rules 4 and 6

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR628

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Jaiswal, A.G.P.

A.A. Desai, J.1. This revision is directed against order dated 2nd May, 1987, dismissing the Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 20 of 1986 filed by the State for setting aside the ex-parte decree. Mr. B.P. Jaiswal, the...

Smt. Rajpati Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 - Sections 18, 21 and 212; Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1989

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR117(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Jaiswal, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 12.12.1994/ 19.12.1994 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau as contained in Annexure 3 where by he has cancelled the...

Ashok Maniklal Harkut Vs. the Collector of Amravati and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 2(7), 2(49), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 18, 19, 23(1), 51(2), 52, 55, 55(1), 55(2), 55(2)(3), 55(3), 55(4), 63, 65, 81(1A), 81(2), 81(3), 81(4), 81(5), 81(9), 82(3), 82(4), 87, 87(4), 92, 167 and 327; Zilla Parishad Act; Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samities Act - Sections 2(9), 2(35), 9(2), 15(A), 19(1), 19(2), 41, 48, 49, 49(7) and 72(3); Maharashtra Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1987

Reported in : AIR1988Bom207; 1988(2)BomCR399; (1987)89BOMLR637; 1988MhLJ378

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Jaiswal and;S.A. Bobade, Advs.

Dharmadhikari, Acg. C.J.1. The Petitioner Ashok Maniklal Harkut was elected as President of the Municipal Council Chandur Bazar, District Amravati. On 12th of June 1987 a requisition incorporating a proposal to move a resolution to remove...

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Hajarnavis, S.R. Deshpande, S.N. Kherdekar, J.N. Chandurkar, B.R. Mandlekar, R.N. Deshpande, V.L. Mohta, R.N. Pendharkar, V.R. Manohar, V.S. Sohoni, R.M. Joharapurkar, B.P. Jaiswal, M.S. Choudhar

Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...

S.M. Mallewar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10(1), 13(3), 14, 19(1), 37, 47, 246, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305 and 326; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 23, 24-A, 52, 53, 54, 56, 136, 139(1), 143 and 144; Madras Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949; Kerala Essential Articles Control (Temporary Powers) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3; Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 58 and 59; Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act - Sections 256; U.P. Town Areas Act - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979;

Reported in : AIR1993Bom327; 2004(3)BomCR371; 1993(1)MhLj685

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Bobde, ;Sunil V. Manohar, ;C.S. Kaptan, ;Mrs. N.S. Jog, ;Miss A. Kinkhed, ;S.G. Aney, ;N.W. Sambre, Advs.

1. By these writ petitions filed under Art. 326 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have impugned the statutory notification dated the 14th of September, 1992, bearing No. BPA-1088/ 1866/EXC-3, issued by the Government of...

Priyanka Kumari Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 83 of 2016 ============================================================= Priyanka Kumari, daughter of Satish Kumar, resident of Majhiaon, P.O., P.S. & District Garhwa. … … Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2....

Free Legal Aid Committee, Through Its Secretary, G.S. Jaiswal Vs. Stat ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.P. Jaiswal

A.K. Prasad, J.1. Free Legal Aid Committee, Jamshedpur, a voluntary registered social organisation (for short petitioner-Organisation) has brought this writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation to award compensation of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) only...

Charudatta S/O Prabhakarrao Pingle Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Admission to Medical Colleges Rules, 1985-86; Admission to Medical Colleges Rules, 1984-85 - Rule 6B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR734; 1986MhLJ907

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Adv.

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution for withholding Rule F(vi) of the Rules for admission for the year 1985-86 and to consider him for admission...

Narendra Keshrichand Fuladi and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1985)IILLJ24Bom; 1985MhLJ1

Deshpande, J.1. By these two petitions, the petitioners pray for striking down the amendment to S. 2(4) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 (Bombay Act LXXIX of 1948), effected by S. 2(b) of the...

Hiraman S/O Dhondu Bawane Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR187

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Sirpurkar, Adv.

S.W. Puranik, J.1. By this appeal, the appellant seeks to quash the order of conviction passed against him under section 376 Indian Penal Code and sentence of one year and fine of Rs. 100/- awarded to...