Advanced Search Results
Varinder Singh Batra Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Aug-13-1993
CriminalCustoms
Customs Act - Sections 108
1993(27)DRJ196
R.M. Bagai,; Rekha Agarwal and; B.P. Aggarwal, Advs
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The Petitioner has challenged the detention order passed on 4.12.92 under Section 3(l) of the Cofeposa (as amended) with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods in future by filing this writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL.S. Bisht Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-18-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
77(1999)DLT211
A.K. Gautam, Adv
ORDERS (.) CHARGE ASSUMPTION REPORT BE SENTTO ALL CONCERNED IMMEDIATELY.4. On 23.3.1995, the Additional Deputy Director (Personnel) wrote to the Deputy Director (Accounts) Pay and Accounts Division in the following terms :Sub: Promotion of Commandant (SC)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Omvati Kalshan Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
Oct-19-2005
Service
Constitution of India - Article 14; ;Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation ) Act 1995 - Sections 2, 47 and 47(2)
125(2005)DLT57; [2006(109)FLR376]; (2006)142PLR5; 2006(2)SLJ495(Delhi)
J.P. Sengh, Adv
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The petitioner, an official working with the first respondent as Receptionist, is aggrieved by the decision dated 09.07.2004 refusing promotion to her. She seeks an appropriate mandatory order and also direction that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Toriyli Alias Jabbar Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-04-1992
Criminal
1993CriLJ2496; 1992(24)DRJ90
Naveen Malhotra and; Naveen Mata, Advs
ORDER1. toriyli alias Jabbar, the petitioner herein was detained in pursuance to an order passed on 6th November, 1991 under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Hind Wire Industries Limited
Delhi
Mar-07-2007
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 15 and 30
2007(2)ARBLR418(Delhi); 2007(95)DRJ307
Anjana Gosain and; Digvijay Rai, Advs
J.M. Malik, J.1. The whole crux of the instant legal jangle lies in the question, whether the Court is armed with the powers to amend or modify the Arbitrator's award? Both the parties to this suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Khem Chand Sharma and anr.
Rajasthan
Jul-23-1992
Service
1992(2)WLC618; 1992(2)WLN185
J.R. Chopra, J.1. This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the judgment dated December 2, 1991 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, which was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalip Kumar Vs. D.D.A.
Delhi
May-09-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. Ujjawal K. Jha, Mr. B.P. Aggarwal
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:09. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 1835/2013 DALIP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ujjawal K. Jha and Mr B.P. Aggarwal, Advs. versus D.D.A. ..... Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElectronic Enterprises Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-17-1999
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
1999VIAD(Delhi)777; AIR2000Delhi55; 83(2000)DLT47; 1999(51)DRJ485
Mr. Sudheesh C. Anand, Adv
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The facts which has led the parties into this litigation are that on 11.4.1989 the Tender of the petitioner in respect of supply of Multimeters together with its 'Carrying Cases' was accepted by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chinar Goods Carriers (Regd.) and ors ...
Delhi
Aug-07-1998
Civil
Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34
AIR1998Delhi394; 1998(47)DRJ557
S.K. Paul and; Salil Paul, Advs
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J. 1. Plaintiff filed suit, inter alia, alleging that it is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1913 having its registered office at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Bombay and one of the branch...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEquipment and Conductors (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Jul-27-1999
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33
2000(52)DRJ266
Rajesh Banati, Adv
Vikrmajeet Singh, J.1. Mr B.P. Aggarwal learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that there was no evidence before the learned Arbitrator which would justified his awarding a sum of Rs 1,01,180.40. It is however...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »