Advanced Search Results
Madan Lal Vs. Competent Authority and anr.
Delhi
Aug-04-1972
Tenancy
Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19
ILR1972Delhi857
Y. Dayal,; Maehswar Dayal and; B.N. Nayar, Advs
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Madan Lal, a tenant, against the judgment of v. S. Deshpande, J. in Civil Writ Petition No 97 of 1968, pronounced on April 1, 1969, dismissing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and Uttar Pradesh Fin ...
Delhi
Jul-04-1995
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29
59(1995)DLT238; 1995(34)DRJ178
S.K. Misra and; B.N. Nayar, Advs
J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This is a petition by Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (herein referred to as the Corporation) under Sections 446 and 537 of Companies Act for leave to sell the properly, which is slated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJainsons Exports India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd.
Delhi
Aug-17-1995
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457
[1996]85CompCas802(Delhi); 59(1995)DLT688; 1995(34)DRJ657
S.N. Gupta,; B.N. Nayar and; R.K. Kapur, Advs
M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J. (1) This company appeal is directed against the order of the learned Company Judge dated 31.3.1995 in Company Petition 93 of 1992. ' The appellant is the auction purchaser of the sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jainsons Export India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd. and Others
Delhi
Mar-31-1995
Company
[1996]85CompCas796(Delhi); 58(1995)DLT571; (1995)111PLR1
B.N. Nayar and; K.N. Tripathy, Advs
J.K. Mehra, J. 1. In this case, the property of the company under liquidation at Bombay was sought to be sold by public auction and such sale being subject to confirmation by this court was confirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMayur Syntex Ltd. (In Liquidation) and Atlantic Engineering Services P ...
Delhi
May-28-1997
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 19, 34, 391, 443, 444, 446, 446(1), (2) and (3), 529, 529(1), (2), 529A and 537; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 31 and 34
1997IVAD(Delhi)821; [1999]96CompCas974(Delhi); 67(1997)DLT836
B.N. Nayar, Adv; R.S. Kanoi,; C.P. Kanoi and;
Dr. M.K. Sharma J. 1. A very important and vital question has been raised in these petitions which requires the immediate attention of this court. The question raised is as to whether on the coming into...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTulison Traders, Delhi and anr. Vs. Gurdit Singh and ors.
Delhi
Sep-14-1973
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11
AIR1974Delhi190; ILR1974Delhi100
T.N. Sethi and; D.P. Gupta, Advs
ORDER1. This civil revision is directed against the judgment dated the 9th August, 1966, passed by Shri D.R. Khanna, Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi, with enhanced appellate Powers whereby he accepted the appeal of respondent Gurdit Singh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited Vs. Majestic A ...
Delhi
Jul-04-1995
BankingCommercial
State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 31 and 46B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 229, 232, 441, 456, 446(2), 529 and 537(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 232(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 69; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960
AIR1995Delhi373; [1999]96CompCas937(Delhi)
S.K. Misra, Adv
ORDER1. This is a petition by Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (herein referred to as the Corporation) under Sections 446 and 537 of Companies Act for leave to sell the property, which is stated to be constituting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Jainsons Exports India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd. and Another
Delhi
Aug-17-1995
CompanyCommercial
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 480; Company (Court) Rules - Rule 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90
AIR1996Delhi105
S.N. Gupta, Adv
ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.1. This company appeal is directed against the order of the learned Company Judge dated 31-3-1995 in Company Petition 93 of 1992. The appellant is the auction purchaser of the sale of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMicronix India Vs. Disco Electronics Ltd.
Delhi
Sep-13-1996
Company
State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529
[1999]96CompCas950(Delhi); 1996RLR487
Manoranjan,; B.N. Nayar,; V.N. Kalra,;
J.K. Mehra, J.(1) In this case the Official Liquidator has challenged the sale of certain properties of the company in respect whereof Official Liquidator had been appointed as the Provisionalliquidator, purported to have been affected by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Prasad Vs. Vinod Motors (Pr.) Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-20-1981
Company
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49
[1984]55CompCas52(Delhi); 20(1981)DLT85
B.N. Nayar and ; S. Jain, Advs
B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The short question which comes up for consideration in this case is as to whether the petitioner is a secured creditor or not. (2) The Company in liquidation belonged to the family of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »