Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b n nayar · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.129 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 04 1972

Madan Lal Vs. Competent Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi857

Advocate for Appellant : Y. Dayal,; Maehswar Dayal and; B.N. Nayar, Advs

T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Madan Lal, a tenant, against the judgment of v. S. Deshpande, J. in Civil Writ Petition No 97 of 1968, pronounced on April 1, 1969, dismissing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1995

Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and Uttar Pradesh Fin ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-04-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT238; 1995(34)DRJ178

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Misra and; B.N. Nayar, Advs

J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This is a petition by Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (herein referred to as the Corporation) under Sections 446 and 537 of Companies Act for leave to sell the properly, which is slated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1995

Jainsons Exports India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457

Reported in : [1996]85CompCas802(Delhi); 59(1995)DLT688; 1995(34)DRJ657

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Gupta,; B.N. Nayar and; R.K. Kapur, Advs

M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J. (1) This company appeal is directed against the order of the learned Company Judge dated 31.3.1995 in Company Petition 93 of 1992. ' The appellant is the auction purchaser of the sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 1995

Jainsons Export India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-1995

Subject : Company

Reported in : [1996]85CompCas796(Delhi); 58(1995)DLT571; (1995)111PLR1

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Nayar and; K.N. Tripathy, Advs

J.K. Mehra, J. 1. In this case, the property of the company under liquidation at Bombay was sought to be sold by public auction and such sale being subject to confirmation by this court was confirmed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1997

Mayur Syntex Ltd. (In Liquidation) and Atlantic Engineering Services P ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-1997

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 19, 34, 391, 443, 444, 446, 446(1), (2) and (3), 529, 529(1), (2), 529A and 537; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 31 and 34

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)821; [1999]96CompCas974(Delhi); 67(1997)DLT836

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Nayar, Adv; R.S. Kanoi,; C.P. Kanoi and;

Dr. M.K. Sharma J. 1. A very important and vital question has been raised in these petitions which requires the immediate attention of this court. The question raised is as to whether on the coming into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1973

Tulison Traders, Delhi and anr. Vs. Gurdit Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-1973

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi190; ILR1974Delhi100

Advocate for Appellant : T.N. Sethi and; D.P. Gupta, Advs

ORDER1. This civil revision is directed against the judgment dated the 9th August, 1966, passed by Shri D.R. Khanna, Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi, with enhanced appellate Powers whereby he accepted the appeal of respondent Gurdit Singh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1995

The Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited Vs. Majestic A ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-04-1995

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 31 and 46B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 229, 232, 441, 456, 446(2), 529 and 537(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 232(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 69; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1995Delhi373; [1999]96CompCas937(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Misra, Adv

ORDER1. This is a petition by Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (herein referred to as the Corporation) under Sections 446 and 537 of Companies Act for leave to sell the property, which is stated to be constituting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1995

M/S. Jainsons Exports India Vs. Binatone Electronics Ltd. and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-1995

Subject : CompanyCommercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 480; Company (Court) Rules - Rule 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : AIR1996Delhi105

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Gupta, Adv

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.1. This company appeal is directed against the order of the learned Company Judge dated 31-3-1995 in Company Petition 93 of 1992. The appellant is the auction purchaser of the sale of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1996

Micronix India Vs. Disco Electronics Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-1996

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas950(Delhi); 1996RLR487

Advocate for Appellant : Manoranjan,; B.N. Nayar,; V.N. Kalra,;

J.K. Mehra, J.(1) In this case the Official Liquidator has challenged the sale of certain properties of the company in respect whereof Official Liquidator had been appointed as the Provisionalliquidator, purported to have been affected by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1981

Sushil Prasad Vs. Vinod Motors (Pr.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-1981

Subject : Company

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas52(Delhi); 20(1981)DLT85

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Nayar and ; S. Jain, Advs

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The short question which comes up for consideration in this case is as to whether the petitioner is a secured creditor or not. (2) The Company in liquidation belonged to the family of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial