Advanced Search Results
Divisional Superintendent N. Railway and anr. Vs. Madan Lal Sarad
Allahabad
Sep-25-1963
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 132(1), 133(1), 133, 226, 313 and 366; Railway Establishment Code - Rule 157; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241(2)
AIR1964All125
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
N.U. Beg, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 132(1) and 133(1)(c) of the Constitution of India filed by the Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway, Lucknow, and the Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Lucknow. The opposite party...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDominion of India Vs. Gaya Pershad
Allahabad
Oct-08-1956
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72
AIR1957All193
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
V. Bhargava, J.1. These four appeals arise out of four different suits which were numbered as Suits Nos. 64/5 of 1947, 72/10 of 1947, 73/11 of 1947 and 74/12 of 1947 in the trial Court. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDivisional Supdt., Northern Rly., Moradabad Vs. Umrao
Allahabad
Sep-23-1959
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 10
AIR1960All283
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
V.D. Bhargava, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act (Act VIII of 1923) by the Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway, Moradabad, against the order, of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Act, Lucknow,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi), Rly. Department, New Delhi Vs. Kailash Chandra
Allahabad
Nov-20-1958
ServiceConstitution
Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2046; Fundamental Rules - Rule 56(1); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1959All434; (1959)IILLJ161All
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
V.D. Bhargava, J. 1. This is an appeal filed by the defendant Union of India, in suit brought by Kailash Chandra respondent who was a clerk formerly in the old Oudh and Rohilkhand Railway Accounts Office...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDominion of India as Owner of G.i.P. Rly. and anr. Vs. Gaya Pershad Go ...
Allahabad
Feb-09-1955
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 160 and 188
AIR1956All338
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
Kidwai, J. 1. This Full Bench has been constituted -to consider the following question which has been formulated by a Division Bench of this Court, namely :'Whether a consignee, who is not the owner of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Through General Manager, E.i. Rly. Vs. Municipal ...
Allahabad
Jan-22-1957
Municipal Tax
Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 140(1) and 162; Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(2)
AIR1957All452
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
Randhir Singh, J.1. This is a reference made by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) of Lucknow under Section 162, U. P. Municipalities Act.2. The Union Government has quite a number of buildings which are in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.B. Lal Vs. the State
Allahabad
Apr-13-1955
Motor VehiclesCriminal
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 42, 42(1), 42(3), 123 and 123(1)
AIR1955All618; 1955CriLJ1443
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
Kidwai, J.1. The applicant Sri R. B. Lal, is the Divisional Superintendent, posted at Lucknow, of the Northern Railway. Truck registered as U. S. J. 3125 was found being used, on 14-7-1952, without a permit and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheo Dulare Lal Sah Vs. Anant Ram and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-31-1953
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 107 and 116; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 139, 142 and 144; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
AIR1954All475
Sarvari Niamatullah and ;B.N. Mulla, Advs.
Malik, C.J. 1. The facts of this case are given in the judgment of the lower appellate Court but it may be convenient to state them briefly here. Lala Saheb Dayal was the owner of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Mool NaraIn and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-18-1959
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27
AIR1959All780
M.M. Gaur and ;B.N. Mulla, Advs.
N.U. Beg, J. 1. This is an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that certain additional evidence specified in the schedule attached to the plaint be admitted at this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShamsher Khan Vs. Sm. Siddiqunnisa and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-17-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(3)
AIR1953All720
B.N. Mulla, Adv.
ORDERMisra, J.1. This criminal revision arises out of proceedings for maintenance under Section 488, Criminal P. C. The Courts below have agreed in holding that Smt. Siddiqunnissa and her three minor children, Ilias, Ishaq and Mush-taq...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›