Advanced Search Results

Vittaldas Jagnnath Khatri and Smt. Kamaladevi Vittaldas Khatri Vs. the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 8 to 11A, 33 and 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 41, Rule 22

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR504; 2008(1)MhLj870

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. This appeal raises the following questions:(i) Could a partition between father and daughters effected before 26-9-1970 be questioned in proceedings to determine surplus lands of the father (ii) Could the Appellate Authority entertain...

Laxman S/O Tukaram Vs. Smt. Bendrabai Wd/O Tukaram Karwate and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) 15(1) and 16; Hindu Law; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(1) and 3(3); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR339; 2005(3)MhLj506

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv. in S.A. No. 158 of 1988 and ;M.S. Deshpande, Adv. in S.A. No. 135 of 1992

K.J. Rohee, J.1. These two appeals have arisen out of the judgment and decree passed by the appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No. 209/1984 allowing the appeal and decreeing Regular Civil Suit No. 618/1982 for...

National Tiles and Marble Company Vs. Joshi and Sons

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5 - Order 6, Rule 14A and 14A(5-9)

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR835

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Heard Shri B.N. Mohta for the petitioner and Advocate V.V. Bhangade for the respondent.2. The petitioner in this petition has challenged three interlocutory orders passed by the...

Shivdas Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.N. Mohta

Oral Judgment: Admitted. Heard finally by consent of parties. Heard Mr. B.N. Mohta, learned counsel for the applicant; Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, learned APP for respondent No.1 and Mr Giramkar, Adv.h/for Mr Lohiya, learned counsel for respondent...

Madhukar Rajanna Darbhe Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 57, 213, 213(1) and 213(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 118 and 119; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 331; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR339; 2008(2)BomCR418

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Both Writ Petitions are filed by original defendants in two different civil suits instituted by present Respondent No. 3 for possession of property on the ground that his father Rajanna has left 'Will'...

Ramchandra Sitaramji Heda and Sona Chemicals, Proprietary Through Prop ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR614

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. The petitioners carry on business of micro-fertilizers in the name and style of Sona Chemicals at MIDC, Amravati. They have been regularly purchasing Borax from outside Amravati and importing it within the limits...

Ashwini Kumar Govardhandas Gandhi and anr. Vs. Gangadhar Dattatraya Ga ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR749; 1990MhLJ18

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. B.N.Mohta

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. This is a reference by a learned Single Judge in Second Appeal No. 48 of 1988. The point referred is as follows :Whether the provisions of Clause 13(1)(a) of the C.P. and Berar...

Pralhad Eknath Fulkari Vs. Ramkrishna Tukaramji Dhage and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Procedure Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 - Sections 57; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR516; 1985MhLJ971

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Defendant No. 1 Pralhad had objected to the maintainability of the suit filed by non-applicant No. 1-Ramkrishna against himself and non-applicant Nos. 2 and 3. The said application Exhibit 12 came to be...

Sarda Education Trust, Through Its Secretary, Anjangaon Surji Vs. Muku ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1), 39 and 129; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 1, 46, 47 and 48; Bombay Public Trusts Act - Sections 2; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR114; 2008(2)MhLj395

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. This appeal by landlords is directed against judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing Writ Petition No. 2090 of 1989 and remanding the proceedings under Section 19(1)(d) of the Bombay...

Anoopchand Nathmal Baid Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 111 and 315(1); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 320 and 322

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR157

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Mohta, Adv.

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal reviewing its earlier order passed in revision and holding that the petitioner was in possession of the suit lands...