Advanced Search Results

L. Krishnan and ors. Vs. the Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Ra ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1972)IILLJ568Ker

P. Subramonian Poti, J.1. The petitioners were employed as 'khalasies' in the Olavakot Division of the Southern Railway. After continuous service of six months, all the petitioners were declared to have acquired the status of 'temporary...

Howrah Trading Company (Private) Ltd. Vs. Fourth Industrial Tribunal a ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1966)IILLJ282Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. Respondent 3, Doodhnath Pandey, used to serve as a durwan under the petitioner-company. On 3 May 1960, the petitioner-company charged respondent 3 with misconduct in the following language:On 27 April 1960 at 9-45...

Pantaloon Retail (India) Ltd. Vs. Tivoli Park Apartment Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER SHEET TA NO.7 OF 201.GA NO.344 OF 201.CS NO.15 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction PANTALOON RETAIL (INDIA) LTD.Versus TIVOLI PARK APARTMENT PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :8. h February,...

S.K. Dutt Vs. Law Book Co. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1914; Copyright Act, 1911 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1954All570

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person, ;S.B.L. Gaur and ;Balishwari Prasad, Advs.

B. Mukerji, J.1. Sri S.K. Dutt, an advocate practising in this Court, has filed this suit purporting to be one under Section 13, Copyright Act, 1914. The plaintiff alleges that he is the author and sole...

Bal Jit and ors. Vs. Chand Kiran and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 28 - Schedule - Article 125

Reported in : AIR1950All7

Advocate for Appellant : B. Mukerji, Adv.

Seth, J.1. Plaintiff-respondent, Chand Kiran, is the next presumptive reversioner to the estate of one Harbans, who died leaving behind him a widow, Mt. Lado. On 4th September 1918, Mt. Lado executed a simple mortgage of...

Raghubir Gir Vs. Badam Gir

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Debt Redemption Act, 1940 - Sections 2(9) and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1951All250

Advocate for Appellant : B. Mukerji, Adv.

Raghubar Dayal, J.1. This is a J.D.'s appeal against the order of the Ct. below disallowing his claim about the non-saleability of certain land in, view of Section 17, U. P, Debt redemption Act.2. The facts...

Mohd. Naim Mohd. Alam Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 30, 30(2) and 31

Reported in : AIR1952All143; [1951]19ITR58(All)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Mukerji, Adv.

Malik C.J. 1. This is a reference under Section 66(1), Income-tax Act. The following two questions have been referred to us for our opinion:'1. Whether by issue of a notice for hearing, of an appeal the...

Hari Singh and ors. Vs. Kallu and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 122

Reported in : AIR1952All149

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Pathak and ;B. Mukerji, Advs.

Sapru, J.1. This is a vendee's appeal in a preemption case. The property in the suit is situate in mauza Mathurapur and is admittedly governed by the custom of pre-emption. The case of the plaintiffs was...

NaIn Singh and ors. Vs. Mahendra Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 6 and 38 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1952All196

Advocate for Appellant : B. Mukerji, Adv.

Mootham, J.1. This appeal arises out of certain proceedings for the execution of a decree passed by a learned Munsif.2. The appellants sued the respondent for Rs. 2,000 as damages resulting from the cutting down by...

Sunder Lal Vs. Ram Sarup and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1952All205

Advocate for Appellant : Gayan Chand Mathur and ;B. Mukerji, Advs.

Sapru, J.1. This is a defendant a application in revision. The opposite party, Ram Sarup, who was the plaintiff in the suit sued the defendant for recovery of Rs. 800 as damages caused to his wooden...