Advanced Search Results
A.J. Machine Tools Vs. Rathi Alloys and Steel Limited
Delhi
Apr-19-1993
Arbitration
Arbitration Act - Sections 20
1993(26)DRJ132
K.N. Kataria,; N.S. Bajwa and; B. Mohan, Advs
Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) The plaintiff has filed a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act which was registered by this court as Suit on 14.9.1992. Along with this petition, an application under section 41,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorporation Bank Vs. Montana International and ors.
Delhi
Jan-12-1995
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3(5)
1995IAD(Delhi)629; 1995(32)DRJ458
A.K. Singhia,; Sanjay Dhar,; B. Mohan and;
Usha Mehra, J. (1) The plaintiff Corporation Bank filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 9,53,653.66 paise based on written contract under the provisions of Order xxxvii of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Aluminium Cables Ltd. Vs. State Elect. Board and ors.
Delhi
Sep-01-1995
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 5 and 11
1995(34)DRJ697
B. Mohan Adv
S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. M/s. Indian Aluminium Cable Limited, the petitioner herein, had offered to supply ACSR conductors 'Panther' size 30/7 3.00 mm conforming to IS : 398/1961 with latest amendment thereof in quantity 490 kilometers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Harprashad and Co. Ltd. Vs. A.N. Pahuja, Inspecting Assistant, Commiss ...
Delhi
Jul-18-1996
Direct TaxationCriminal
Income Tax Act, 1961- Sections 276C(1)
ILR1997Delhi15; [1998]229ITR101(Delhi)
B. Mohan and; R.D. Jolly, Advs
Usha Mehra, J.(1) A very short and interesting point has been raised in this petition; whether criminal proceedings to continue in spite of quashing of the order of penalty by the final authority under the Income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Aluminium Cables Ltd. Vs. Ex Sud Ltd.
Delhi
Oct-16-1992
ContractArbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33
1993(1)ARBLR342(Delhi); 49(1993)DLT367; 1992(24)DRJ352
Kapil Sibal,; B. Mohan,; N.K. Kantawala,;
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The facts giving rise to this a petition &re; that M/S Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd, hereinafter called the petitioner entered into negotiations with M/S Vistas Trading Company having its registered office at 106B,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushila Devi Bhaskar Vs. Ishwar Nagar Cooperative House Building Socie ...
Delhi
Oct-11-1991
Trusts and Societies
Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 26
45(1991)DLT518
Arun Mohan,; Vishal Jain and; B. Mohan, Advs
S.N. Sapra, J. (1) In this writ petition, petitioner seeks to challenge the decision and directions of respondents 1 and 4, to cancel the lease of plot No. 7, Ishwar Nagar, Delhi. (2) The main question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Vidyut Products Ltd. Vs. Shri B.M. Patel
Delhi
Feb-09-2000
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC),1908- Sections 20
2000IIIAD(Delhi)29; 2000(53)DRJ32
Sh. B. Mohan, Adv
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. (name changed w.e.f. 26th March, 1998 to Hindustan Vidyut Products Ltd.) filed this suit, inter alia, alleging that it is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPnb Capital Services Ltd. Vs. Sumac International Limited and ors.
Delhi
May-06-1996
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4
1996IIAD(Delhi)621; II(1996)BC56; 63(1996)DLT12
R.K. Sanghi,; B. Mohan and; P.K. Behl, Advs
S.K. Mahajan, J. (1) This order will dispose of the application of the plaintiff for the grant of an interim injunction as also the application of defendant No. 2 under Order 39, Rule 4 Civil Procedure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwar Industries Ltd. Vs. the Crocus Chattels Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Jan-12-2006
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 11 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 3; Constitution of India - Article 215
128(2006)DLT10; 2006(87)DRJ430
B. Mohan and; Rajiv Dewan, Advs
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. This is a petition under Sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (defendants in the original suit No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Vs. The Union of India and Another
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-08-2014
Land Acquisition
Shri. L.V. Sangit
A.M. Badar, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner is praying for setting aside his order of termination of service and for directing the respondents to calculate his service as continuous service and to award all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »