Advanced Search Results

Brahma Pal Singh Randi Vs. Dy. Director of Education, Meerut and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16E and 16F - Regulations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6(1), 7 and 18

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2505; (2002)1UPLBEC794

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik Dhan Prakash and ;Sudhir Agarwal, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Sri B.Malik, counsel for the petitioner, Sri V. K. Shukla appearing for the respondent No. 2 and learned standing counsel. 2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent...

Shil Chandra Vs. Viith Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradab ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1627

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Heard Sri B. Malik learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri V.K. Goel learned counsel representing respondent Nos, 2 to 7/2 as well as learned standing counsel for respondent...

State of Haryana Vs. Mahender Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59(5); State Reorganisation Act; West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 54 and 55; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 32, 72 and 161; West Bengal Jail Code; Prisons Rules - Rules 2, 20 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 432, 433 and 433A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433A

Reported in : 2008CriLJ444; 2007(12)SCALE669; 2007AIRSCW6988

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Mishra,; Vijay Hansaria and; B. Malik, Sr. Advs.,;

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. A circular letter issued by the State of Haryana laying down criteria for pre-mature release of the prisoners has been declared to be unconstitutional by a Division Bench of the Punjab and...

Mangey Ram. Vs. Mangey Ram.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 7 Rule 11; Specific Relief Act - Section 34

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik, Adv.

1. Khasra No. 833 A area 2 Bigha 10 Biswa 1 Biswansi and Khasra No. 433 B area 16 Biswa 6 Biswansi, total 2 plots and total area 3 Bigha 8 Biswa 7 Biswansi are subject...

Pramod Kumar and Others Vs. Sub-divisional Officer, Khaga Fatehpur and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act - Sections 219; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reform Act - Sections 229B

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3481

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. After rejecting earlier the prayer for adjournment made by Sri B. Malik, learned counsel for the petitioners, we heard him and Sri H. R. Mishra, learned standing counsel appearing...

Ram Kishan and ors. Vs. Sri Ganeshi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1283

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik, ;V.C. Mishra and ;S.V. Mishra, Advs.

Umeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Sri B. Malik, learned counsel for the appellants. None has however, appeared on behalf of the respondent,2. This second appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 31.1.1981 passed by the...

Shiv Ganesh and Vs. State of U.P.,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act 1974 - Sections 5, 9, 10(2), 13, 13A, 31(2), 31(3) and 31(4); Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1976; Uttar pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 19(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005All412

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik and ;K.K. Bajpai, Advs.

Krishna Murari, J.1. Heard Sri B. Malik, learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners, Sri Sanjai Goswami, Learned standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Awadhesh Singh holding brief of Sri R.C. Gupta appearing for the allottees...

Sarojit Malik Vs. National Insurance Co. and Another

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

R.N. Mittal, President: 1. Briefly the facts of the case are that the complainant sent 11 packages of used household and personal effects from Delhi to Boston (Norfolk) through respondent No. 2. The packages were got...

Sitaram Jaipuria and ors. Vs. Banwarilal Jaipuria

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2 and 22; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 34(2), 149 and 173(2); ;Industrial Development and Regulation Act, 1969 - Section 11

Reported in : AIR1972Cal105,76CWN161

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Sen, ;R.C. Nag and ;Sunil Mukherjee, Advs.

P.B. Mukharji, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of S.K. Mukherjea, J., dated the 16th March, 1971.2. This was an application in a representative action by a shareholder for an injunction restraining the...

Kuldeep vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2804/2018 Judgment delivered on:11.09.2018 KULDEEP ........ Petitioner versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this...