Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b m sen · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.146 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 2001

international Security and Intelligence Agency Limited. Vs. Municipal ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-17-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 20, 30, 32, 33 and 37 (1); Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5, 43, 202 and 476 - Schedule - Articles 119, 137 and 158; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21; Telegraph Act, 1885

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)87; AIR2001Delhi283a; 90(2001)DLT243; 2000(57)DRJ582; 2001(3)RLR25

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv.; with Mr. P. Nandrajog, Adv

ORDERVIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1. Suit No. 569-A of 1997 has been filed for making the Award relating to case No. ARB/JC/1 dated 14th March, 1997, passed by Justice Jagdish Chandra (Retd.) as Rule of the Court and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2000

Stick Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ethiopian Airlines

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(58)DRJ119

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Chadha and; Minaxi Singh, Advs

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The controversy that has arisen in this present dispute centres upon the interpretation that is to be given to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Ethiopian Airlines had appointed Messers Stic Travels...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1956

Tustu Charan Ghose Vs. Kali Kumar Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-1956

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1957Cal122,61CWN90

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Sen, ;B.M. Sen and ;Sailendra Nath Banerjee, Advs.

K.C. Das Gupta, J.1. The subject-matter of this litigation is land which was purchased by one Kenamoni Dassi. The plaintiffs who are the sons of one of Kenamoni's brothers brought a suit for declaration of their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 11 1954

Surya Kumar Chatterjee and anr. Vs. S.N. Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-11-1954

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1955Cal365,58CWN656

Advocate for Appellant : B.M. Sen, ;S.K. Mukherji and ;S.K. Bhattacharya, Advs.

Sinha, J. 1.The petitioners before me are two clerks employed in the Mission Row Post Office (subordinate service). It appears that on 5th of September 1950, a memorandum was issued by theSuperintendent of Post Office, South...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1988

Mohinder Pal Mohindra Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-19-1988

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi270; 1989(1)ARBLR326(Delhi); 37(1989)DLT345; 1989(16)DRJ244; 1989RLR139

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mittal and; Maehswar Dayal, Advs

P.K. Bahri, J.(1) These two petitions are being disposed of by this order. Facts, in brief, are that a contract was entered into between Delhi Administration and Mohinder Pal by virtue of the which the work...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1975

State of West Bengal Vs. A.K. Ghosh and Bros

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-11-1975

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21, 30 and 34; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1975Cal227,79CWN349

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Sen Gupta, ;Nani Gopal Das and ;Jolly Sett, Advs.

M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of the State of West Bengal and it arises out of a suit instituted by the respondent for recovery of money.2. The respondent entered into a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1961

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. B.M. Sen

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-10-1961

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299(1); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 33

Reported in : AIR1963Cal456

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Bhabra and ;R.N. Dutt, Advs.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application challenging the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and an award made thereunder.2. The Respondent is a Contractor who was entrusted with certain construction works to be done...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial