Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission
Mumbai
Jul-28-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)163CTR(Bom)440; [2001]112TAXMAN523(Bom)
B.M. Chatterjee and R.N. Bandopadbyay, for the Assessee R.A. Dada, Murlidharan, P.K. Shroff and Subodh Joshi, for the Revenue
Daga, J.This petition is preferred by the revenue against the order of the Settlement Commissioner in the case of Ajmera Housing Corporation, Bombay, relating to the assessment years 1989-90 to 1993-94.In order to appreciate the grievance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Morarji Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Nov-26-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]108TAXMAN502(Bom)
S.E. Dastur, B.V. Jhaveri and JI. Patel, for the Applicant R.V. Desai and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent
Saraf, J.By this reference under section 2 56(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion:'Whether, on the' facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Camco Colour Co.
Mumbai
Nov-26-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)173CTR(Bom)255
R. V. Desai with P.S. Jetly & B.M. Chatterjee i/b H.D. Rathod, for the Revenue A.K Jasani, for the Assessee
V. C. Daga, J. This appeal is filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), raising a question with respect to the claim for deduction under sections 80HH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Prakash Chandra
Mumbai
Feb-07-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)176CTR(Bom)173; [2002]122TAXMAN862(Bom)
P.J. Pardiwalla, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent
J.P. Devadhar, J. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, rule is taken up for final hearing.2. In this petition, petitioner challenged the notice dated 31-1-2001 for reopening of the assessment issued under section 148...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Paresh S. Shah
Mumbai
Nov-24-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)153CTR(Bom)452
R.V. Desal with B.M Chatterjee, for the Applicant None, for the Respondent
DR. BY. SARAF, J.By this reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion at the instance of the Revenue.'Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Sinnar Bidi Udyog Ltd.
Mumbai
Jun-04-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN559(Bom)
R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly, B.M. Chatterjee & H.D. Rathod, for the Revenue B.N. Zhaveri & Ajay Singh, for the Assessee
H.L. Gokhale, J.Heard Mr. Desai for the appellant. Mr. Zhaveri with Mr. Singh appears for the respondent (assessee).2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeks...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamanand Sagar Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Feb-11-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]122TAXMAN152(Bom)
A.P. Sathe and Ms. A.A. Sathe, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue
V.C. Daga, J.This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here in after referred to as 'the Act') is at the instance of the assessee Shri Ramanand Sagar of Natraj Studio, producer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Mumbai
Jan-07-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN349(Bom)
R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue P.Y. Vaidya and S.N. Inamdar, for the Assessee
V.C. Daga, J. These two appeals, filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are directed against the order passed by the Tribunal, Pune Bench, raising substantial question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Apar Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-03-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]122TAXMAN631(Bom)
R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue Ms. A. Vissanji and S.J. Mehta, for the Assessee
V.C. Daga, J. This appeal under section 27A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is directed against the order of the Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 'B', in IT Appeal No. 44...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUma Corporation Vs. Krishna Prabhakar, Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...
Mumbai
Mar-14-2006
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68(2) and 148
(2006)204CTR(Bom)282; [2006]284ITR67(Bom)
Percy Pardiwalla and ;P.Y. Vaidya i/b ;A.K. Jasani, Advs.
1. Heard Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.M. Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Rule. Returnable forthwith.3. By consent, rule is heard finally at this stage.4. On March 7, 2006, we...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »