Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b m chatterjee · Page 1 of about 60 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 2000

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)163CTR(Bom)440; [2001]112TAXMAN523(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : B.M. Chatterjee and R.N. Bandopadbyay, for the Assessee R.A. Dada, Murlidharan, P.K. Shroff and Subodh Joshi, for the Revenue

Daga, J.This petition is preferred by the revenue against the order of the Settlement Commissioner in the case of Ajmera Housing Corporation, Bombay, relating to the assessment years 1989-90 to 1993-94.In order to appreciate the grievance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Morarji Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]108TAXMAN502(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.E. Dastur, B.V. Jhaveri and JI. Patel, for the Applicant R.V. Desai and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent

Saraf, J.By this reference under section 2 56(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion:'Whether, on the' facts and in the circumstances of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 2001

Cit Vs. Camco Colour Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(Bom)255

Advocate for Appellant : R. V. Desai with P.S. Jetly & B.M. Chatterjee i/b H.D. Rathod, for the Revenue A.K Jasani, for the Assessee

V. C. Daga, J. This appeal is filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), raising a question with respect to the claim for deduction under sections 80HH...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 2002

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Bom)173; [2002]122TAXMAN862(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Pardiwalla, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent

J.P. Devadhar, J. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, rule is taken up for final hearing.2. In this petition, petitioner challenged the notice dated 31-1-2001 for reopening of the assessment issued under section 148...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Paresh S. Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-24-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)153CTR(Bom)452

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desal with B.M Chatterjee, for the Applicant None, for the Respondent

DR. BY. SARAF, J.By this reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion at the instance of the Revenue.'Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2002

Cit Vs. Sinnar Bidi Udyog Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]123TAXMAN559(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly, B.M. Chatterjee & H.D. Rathod, for the Revenue B.N. Zhaveri & Ajay Singh, for the Assessee

H.L. Gokhale, J.Heard Mr. Desai for the appellant. Mr. Zhaveri with Mr. Singh appears for the respondent (assessee).2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2002

Ramanand Sagar Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]122TAXMAN152(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Sathe and Ms. A.A. Sathe, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue

V.C. Daga, J.This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here in after referred to as 'the Act') is at the instance of the assessee Shri Ramanand Sagar of Natraj Studio, producer of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2002

Cit Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]121TAXMAN349(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue P.Y. Vaidya and S.N. Inamdar, for the Assessee

V.C. Daga, J. These two appeals, filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are directed against the order passed by the Tribunal, Pune Bench, raising substantial question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

Cwt Vs. Apar Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]122TAXMAN631(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Revenue Ms. A. Vissanji and S.J. Mehta, for the Assessee

V.C. Daga, J. This appeal under section 27A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is directed against the order of the Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 'B', in IT Appeal No. 44...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2006

Uma Corporation Vs. Krishna Prabhakar, Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68(2) and 148

Reported in : (2006)204CTR(Bom)282; [2006]284ITR67(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Percy Pardiwalla and ;P.Y. Vaidya i/b ;A.K. Jasani, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.M. Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Rule. Returnable forthwith.3. By consent, rule is heard finally at this stage.4. On March 7, 2006, we...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial