Advanced Search Results

Wali Mohammed Vs. Batulbai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125(1), 127 and 127(3); Mohammadan Law

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2755; [2003(4)JCR625(MP)]; 2003(3)MPHT113; 2003(2)MPLJ513

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Desai, Dy. Adv. General, ;H.S. Uberoi, ;B.L. Pavecha and ;Jaisingh, Sr. Advs. as Amicus Curiae

N.K. Jain, J.1. All these matters arising out of the proceedings initiated by Muslim wives against their (former) husbands for grant of maintenance allowance or recovery of the amount already awarded, under Section 125 of the...

Noormohammad Bhurekhan Vs. Masidkhan Chandkhan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1992(0)MPLJ412

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Adv.

ORDERS.D. Jha, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is defendant in Civil Suit No. 1/22/90, pending in Court of Civil Judge Class II, Badnagar, District...

Shekhar Bhargava Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT378

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv. and ;N.K. Dave, Adv.

S.K. Seth, J. 1. This is an intra Court appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent for expunging certain remarks made by the learned Single Judge against the appellant herein while disposing of the Writ...

Rajkumar Patni Vs. Smt. Manorama Patni

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : II(2000)DMC702

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv. and ;Mittal, Adv.

A.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of another connected first appeal being F.A. No. 319/94 as both these appeals arise out of a common judgment and the decree....

Amrat Vs. Thagibai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : I(2003)DMC441

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sadhana Pathak, Adv.

A.K. Gohil, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd November, 1994 passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 22-A/92 by Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Sendhwa whereby Court dismissed...

Man Industries (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT367

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv. and ;Sadhna Pathak, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were justified in holding that petitioner was not eligible for submitting tender pursuant to Notice Inviting...

Manoj Surgical Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Companies Act, 1956; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12; ;Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956- Sections 8

Reported in : [2006]143STC101(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Counsel and ;Sunil Jain, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. By filing this writ, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks quashing of an order, dated September 30, 2002 (annexure P-1), passed by State (State Level...

Dineshkumar Shukla Vs. Smt. Neeta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1), 13B, 13B(1) and 13B(2)

Reported in : AIR2005MP106; II(2005)DMC51; 2005(4)MPHT168; 2005(1)MPLJ362

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Kochatta, Adv.

S.K. Seth, J. 1. Noticing diametrical opposite views taken by co-ordinate benches learned single Judge has referred the following question to resolve the conflict of views.'Whether the Court is required to wait for a period of...

Surajmal and anr. Vs. Sunderlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115(1) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT158; 2003(2)MPLJ408

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Kutumble, ;G.L. Verma and ;J.K. Joshi, Advs.

ORDERN.K. Jain, J. 1. This reference has been made to resolve the conflict between two sets of Single Bench decisions of this Court viz.; Sawal Singh, 2002(4) M.P.H.T. 200 = 2002(11) MPJR 169; Narsingh, 2002(11) MPJR...

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Asharam

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1997ACJ1224

Advocate for Appellant : Anand Agarwal, Adv.

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The unsuccessful defendants have filed this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 16.8.1988 rendered by Second Additional Judge to the court of District...