Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b l nema · Page 1 of about 164 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 14 2001

Gyan Chand Anil Kumar Vs. Ito

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-14-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)169CTR(MP)27

Advocate for Appellant : B. L. Nema with Kum. S. Agrawal, for the Assessee Rohit Arya, for the Revenue

Arun Mishra, J.This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, with respect to assessment year 1990-91 against order passed by Tribunal. Income of Rs. 1,29,607 was shown by the assessee/appellant whereas the Income Tax Officer (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2002

Madhya Pradesh Madhyam Vs. Cit and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(MP)92

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema, for the Assessee

ORDERArun Mishra, J.Petitioner is assailing the issuance of show-cause notice as to why registration be not cancelled under the provisions of section 12A read with section 12AA of Income Tax Act. Petitioner was granted registration as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1998

Arjun Singh and anr. Vs. Asstt. Direction of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)159CTR(MP)53

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibbal & B.L. Nema with Ravindra Srivastava, for the Petitioners Tankha & JP. Sanghi, for the Respondent

ORDERD.P.S. Chouhan, J.Threatened with the invasion of their rights, the petitioners, in these two writ petitions, numbered 2593/1997 and 1723/1998, approached this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, seeking protection against illegal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 2000

Bhagwandas Shobhalal JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)164CTR(MP)224

Advocate for Appellant : B. L.. Nema with Sumit Nema, for the Assessee ?A.P. Shrivastava, for the Revenue

ORDERC. K. Prasad, J .On a prima facie finding that the order of the assessing officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, Commissioner issued notice, dated 10-5-2000, under section 263 of the Income...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2000

Shobha Soya Oil Products Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)164CTR(MP)222

Advocate for Appellant : B. L. Nema with Sumit Nema, for the Petitioner A.P. Shrivastava, for the Revenue

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.On a prima facie finding that the order of the assessing officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue , Commissioner issued notice dated 10-5-2000, under section 263 of the Income Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Dr. Harish Bajaj Vs. Rani Durgavati Vishwa Vidyalaya and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 11; Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Parishad Adhiniyam, 1990 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidhyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP114; 2003(1)MPLJ375

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema, Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The relief of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is to direct respondent No. 1 Rani Durgavati Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur to amend the degree of the petitioner from that of M. D....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 1999

Raymond Cement Works, Bilaspur and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-1999

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2000MP19; 1999(2)MPLJ689

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema, Sr. Adv. and ;Ravindra Shrivastava, Adv.

A.K. Mathur, C.J. 1. All these L.P.A's arise out of the common order and are being disposed of by this common order. Facts given in L.P.A. No. 119/99 have been taken into consideration for disposal of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1998

Arjun Singh and anr. Vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax (investigati ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 132, 132(1), 143(3), 144A, 147, 148, 148(2), 151 and 282; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16(3), 17 and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 11, 12, 13(1) and 13(2)

Reported in : [2000]246ITR363(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibbal, ;B.L. Nema and ;Ravinder Shrivastava, Advs.

D. P. S. Chauhan, J.1. Threatened with the invasion of their rights, the petitioners, in these two writ petitions, numbered 2593 of 1997 and 1723 of 1998, approached this court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1978

Jagdish Rice Mills Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-30-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139(1), 139(2), 139(4), 143(3) and 263(1)

Reported in : [1978]114ITR817(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema and ;A.S. Jha, Advs.

A.P. Sen, C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, at the instance of the assessee, referring certain questions of law said to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1984

Parshotam Lal Sood and Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 171

Reported in : [1984]147ITR739(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema, Adv.

J.S. Verma, J.1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the. I.T. Act, 1961, to answer the following question, namely :' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial